Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion

NCT ID: NCT04090944

Last Updated: 2019-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Proper position of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) requires confirmation to ensure the adequacy of laryngeal seal and pulmonary ventilation. This confirmation may help in prevention of the peri-operative airway complication and ventilation events associated with LMA placement

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is common practice to inflate the cuff of LMA with the maximum recommended volume (size 3, 20 ml; size 4, 30 ml; size 5, 40 ml), as illustrated in several studies , but it may become more rigid which may cause displacement of the LMA and decreases the airway sealing of LMA, more pressure on pharyngeal mucosa which might cause severe mucosal ischemia leading to post- operative sore throat, dysphagia or hoarseness.

Ultrasonography can reliably confirm correct placement of supraglottic devices like laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and rules out causes of inadequate ventilation , also it was found to be a sensitive in detecting rotational malposition of LMA in children.

the replacement of air with saline in LMA cuffs enable detection of cuffs in the airway allowing visualization of the surrounding structures and tissues as the ultrasound beam can be transmitted through the fluid-filled cuffs without being reflected from air mucosal interface.

the adequacy of LMA position will be confirmed by a fiberoptic laryngoscope (FOL)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

the Position of Laryngeal Mask Airway

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1st group (group B)

The LMA LarySeal Multiple will be inserted using the blind technique which involves holding the LMA like a pen guided into the pharynx with the index finger of the operator at the junction of the tube and the bowl, with the operator at the head of the patient and the LMA facing caudally.

The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading devised by Aoyama et al.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) for confirmation of LMA position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading licensed by Aoyama et al.

2nd group:(group U)

The LMA LarySeal Multiple will be inserted under the guide of B-mode US on the anterior neck . Transverse scans , Sagittal view and Parasagittal view.

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading devised by Aoyama et al.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) for confirmation of LMA position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading licensed by Aoyama et al.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) for confirmation of LMA position

-The position of LMA will be assessed by another anesthetist (blinded assessor) using the fiberoptic laryngoscope (KARL STORZ 11301BN1, Germany) per the grading licensed by Aoyama et al.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged from 18- 60 years of either sex, ASA physical status I - II, weighting 50-100 kg, who will scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Patients whom LMA is contraindicated as patients who are at an increased risk of gastric aspiration as (obstetrics, hiatal hernia or esophageal reflux ), patients with high airway resistance e.g. (bronchospasm or pulmonary edema), patients with low pulmonary compliance e.g. (obesity), cases of an inability to open the mouth or an infection or pathologic abnormality within the oral cavity or pharynx and nonsupine position of operation .
* Patients with a known or predicted difficult airway as patients with class III and IV Modified Mallampati Score or with score \> 5 wilson's risk score.
* Patients with cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease), history of renal or hepatic insufficiency, and endocrinal Diseases will be excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beni-Suef University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

mohammed abd elrehman moselhy

Mohammed Abd Elrehman Moselhy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mohammed abd moselhy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

lecturer in anesthesia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beni-suef University Hospital

Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

mohammed abd moselhy, MD

Role: CONTACT

0201145504361

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

mohammed abd moselhy, MD

Role: primary

0201145504361

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Beni-suef Hospital

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment of Pediatric Challenging Airway
NCT06443424 NOT_YET_RECRUITING