I-gel vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02923427

Last Updated: 2020-10-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the effects of i-gel and Laryngeal mask airway Supreme (LMA-Supreme) on ventilation parameters and surgical view during Trendelenburg Position laparoscopic gynecological surgery in cases administered positive pressure ventilation without the use of neuromuscular agents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, randomized and double-blind study, aged from 18 to 65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

The patients are randomly assigned to 2 groups:

* Group 1: i-gel
* Group 2: LMA- Supreme

Procedure:

The investigation protocol contains the following sections:

1. Induction of anaesthesia. For preoperative sedation 0.02 mg/kg midazolam IV will be administered. 2 minutes of 0.2 µ/kg/min remifentanil and 6 mg kg st-1 propofol infusion, IV 1-2 mg kg-1 propofol . No muscle relaxant will be used for insertion of the airway device.
2. Bispectral index values will be held between 40-60.Bispectral index values will be within this interval by increasing or decreasing propofol infusion by 1 mg/kg after additional bolus dose of propofol (1 mg/kg).
3. Insertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations. All devices are deflated a lubricated prior to use. Once inserted, the cuff is be inflated with a manometer up to 60 cm H20 Data recorded: size of airway device, time an number of attempts.
4. Anesthesia maintenance will be ensured by 50% O2/air with 0.1-0.4 µ kg/min-1 remifentanil and 50-150 µ kg/ min-1 (4-10 mg/kg/hr) propofol IV infusion
5. Functionality of the gastric drainage channel of the airway device: passage of a 14 G size tube.
6. Measurement of airway seal pressure (oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP): at baseline, and at 2 minutes after airway device insertion (T1), 10 minutes after insufflation (T2), before desufflation (T3), before removal of airway device (T4). The maximum pressure allowed is 40 cm H2O.
7. Ventilatory mechanics and parameters and hemodynamic parameters are measured at baseline, and at T1, T2, T3 and T4.
8. Perioperative complications: Cough, vomiting, laryngeal spasm, laryngeal Stridor, airway intervention requirements, hypoxia (SpO2 \< 92%)
9. Removal of the airway device: Presence of blood - 3 level grading (1:no blood; 2: trace amounts of blood; 3: clear amounts of blood). Complications: sore throat ( VAS:10-point scale), dysphonia (yes/no), dysphagia (yes/no).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Morbidity Anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laryngeal mask Supreme

Insertion of the "Laryngeal mask Supreme" and evaluation of its clinical performance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laryngeal mask Supreme Evaluation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion, ventilation and complications

i-gel

Insertion of the "i-gel" and evaluation of its clinical performance

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

i-gel Evaluation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion,ventilation and complications

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laryngeal mask Supreme Evaluation

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion, ventilation and complications

Intervention Type DEVICE

i-gel Evaluation

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion,ventilation and complications

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification group I-II
2. between 18-65 years
3. undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery

Exclusion Criteria

1. Those with any neck or upper respiratory tract pathology
2. Those at risk of gastric content regurgitation/aspiration (previous upper Gastrointestinal system surgery, known hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, history of peptic ulcers, full stomach, pregnancy)
3. Those with low pulmonary compliance or high airway resistance (chronic pulmonary diseases)
4. Obese patients (BMI \>35)
5. Those with throat pain, dysphagia and dysphonia
6. Those with possible or previous difficult airway
7. Those with operations planned for longer than 4 hours
8. Conversion to laparatomy
9. Neuromuscular blocking agent used
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dokuz Eylul University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sule Ozbilgin

Dokuz Eylul University, MD, Anesthesiologists.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ferim Günenç, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

266-SBKAEK

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id