A Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain Versus LMA Supreme in Children
NCT ID: NCT02380768
Last Updated: 2015-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
NCT03108391
A Comparison of the LMA Unique and LMA Supreme in Children
NCT01409785
Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura Once vs. Supreme in Children
NCT01718782
A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) - Unique and LMA-Supreme in Children
NCT01653795
A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme and I-gel in Children
NCT01633073
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ambu AuraGain
Subjects will receive the Ambu AuraGain size 1.5 or 2.0 based on manufacturer guidelines
Ambu AuraGain (size 1.5 or size 2.0)
The device will be inserted and timed. A leak pressure test will be performed after successful insertion and after 10 minutes. The larynx will be visualized by placing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the device. A gastric tube will be inserted through the device and timed.
LMA Supreme
Subjects will receive the Ambu AuraGain size 1.5 or 2.0 based on manufacturer guidelines
LMA Supreme (size 1.5 or size 2.0)
The device will be inserted and timed. A leak pressure test will be performed after successful insertion and after 10 minutes. The larynx will be visualized by placing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the device. A gastric tube will be inserted through the device and timed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ambu AuraGain (size 1.5 or size 2.0)
The device will be inserted and timed. A leak pressure test will be performed after successful insertion and after 10 minutes. The larynx will be visualized by placing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the device. A gastric tube will be inserted through the device and timed.
LMA Supreme (size 1.5 or size 2.0)
The device will be inserted and timed. A leak pressure test will be performed after successful insertion and after 10 minutes. The larynx will be visualized by placing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the device. A gastric tube will be inserted through the device and timed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-III classification
* Weighing between 5 - 20 kilograms
Exclusion Criteria
* History of difficult mask ventilation
* Diagnosis of congenital syndrome with difficult airway management
* Active gastrointestinal reflux
* Coagulopathy
* Significant Pulmonary disease
* Emergent surgery
3 Months
6 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Narasimhan Jagannathan
Primary Investigator; M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Narasimhan Jagannathan, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
White MC, Cook TM, Stoddart PA. A critique of elective pediatric supraglottic airway devices. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Jul;19 Suppl 1:55-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02997.x.
Jagannathan N, Ramsey MA, White MC, Sohn L. An update on newer pediatric supraglottic airways with recommendations for clinical use. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Apr;25(4):334-45. doi: 10.1111/pan.12614. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Langen KE, Anderson K. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jun;67(6):632-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07088.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
Jagannathan N, Sohn L, Sommers K, Belvis D, Shah RD, Sawardekar A, Eidem J, Dagraca J, Mukherji I. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway unique in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure? Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Oct;23(10):927-33. doi: 10.1111/pan.12145. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 2015-252
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.