Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme in Laparoscopic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02511652

Last Updated: 2016-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices (SGA), the new Ambu AuraGain and the LMA Supreme, in sixty female patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy in the trendelemburg position.

Primary outcome is the airway seal pressure. Secondary outcomes are ease of insertion, quality of ventilation, endoscopic view of the glottis, gastric tube passage and complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patients are randomly assigned to 2 groups:

* Group 1: Ambu AuraGain.
* Group 2: LMA Supreme, Teleflex

Procedure:

The investigation protocol contains the following sections:

1. Induction of anaesthesia. Intravenous infusion of remifentanil and propofol targeting the effect site (2-4 ng/ml and 4-6 µg/ml respectively). No muscle relaxant will be used for insertion of the SGA. Rocuronium 0.2 mg/Kg will be administered before initiation of pneumoperitoneum.
2. Insertion of the SGAs. The size of the SGA device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations. All devices are deflated a lubricated prior to use. Once inserted, the cuff is be inflated with a manometer up to 60 cm H20 Position of the device is adjusted if needed. Data recorded: size of SGA, time an number of attempts.
3. Fibreoptic evaluation of the SGAs anatomical position: complete view of the vocal cords (I), epiglottis visible inside, but not causing obstruction (II), epiglottis visible and obstructing the glottic inlet (III), or glottic structures not identified (IV).
4. Functionality of the gastric drainage channel of the SGAs: passage of a 16 G size tube.
5. Measurement of airway seal pressure (oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP): at baseline, and at 15, 30 and 60 minutes. The maximum pressure allowed is 40 cm H2O.
6. Ventilatory mechanics and parameters are measured at baseline, and at 15, 30 and 60 minutes.

Perioperative complications: Hiccup, gastric distension, regurgitation / Aspiration, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, dental, mucosal or tongue injury, hypoxia (SpO2 \< 92%)
7. Removal of the SGAs: Presence of blood - 3 level grading (+/++/+++) Postoperative complications: sore throat, hoarseness, dysphonia, dysphagia, dysphagia: 3-point scale

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopy Airway Management Supraglottic Airway Devices

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ambu AuraGain

Insertion of the supraglottic device and evaluation of its clinical performance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ambu AuraGain evaluation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion, ventilation, position and complications

Laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the trendelemburg position

LMA Supreme

Insertion of the supraglottic device and evaluation of its clinical performance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LMA Supreme evaluation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion, ventilation, position and complications

Laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the trendelemburg position

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ambu AuraGain evaluation

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion, ventilation, position and complications

Intervention Type DEVICE

LMA Supreme evaluation

Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of Insertion, ventilation, position and complications

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laparoscopic surgery

Gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the trendelemburg position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients evaluated as eligible for a SGA
* ASA I-III
* Without criteria for difficult airway
* Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/m2
* The patient has signed the Informed Consent
* The patient understands his or hers rights and consequences related to this investigation

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned operation time \> 2 hours
* High risk of regurgitation
* Respiratory tract pathology
* Preoperative sore throat
* Patients with a known or predicted difficult airway
* Patients diagnosed with dementia or any mental handicaps
* Patient who has a guardian.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ambu A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ana M Lopez

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ana M Lopez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ambulatory Surgery, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HBarcelona

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.