AMBU AScope2 Fiberoptic Intubation Versus Fastrach Intubating LMA

NCT ID: NCT01656967

Last Updated: 2018-11-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two types of supraglottic airways (SGA), the Ambu® Aura-I and the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA), regarding time to intubate, ease of insertion, sealing properties, optical view upon fiberoptic examination regarding the Ambu Aura-I, ease and success rate of intubation, airway morbidity, and patient comfort in patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will include a total of 66 patients. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups through a computer generated randomization schedule. Patients in group A (N= 30) will be intubated using Ambu Aura-I and the Ambu aScope and patients in group B (N= 30) will be intubated using Intubating LMA. Patients will only be tested with one device.In the operating room, standard monitoring devices will be applied including a pulse oximeter, 3 lead (at least) ECG and blood pressure cuff; the latter could be invasive or non-invasive depending on the nature of the surgery. Baseline measures of BP, pulse, oxygen saturation, and CO2 will be made. The time will be noted before any sedation or anesthesia is administered. Vital signs will be recorded after induction of anesthesia, after insertion of SGA, and again after successful intubation.

General anesthesia will be induced by bolus administration of propofol (1.5 to 2mg/kg) and fentanyl (1mcg/kg), and maintained with an inhalational agent. Rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) will be administered to provide muscle relaxation and a mixture of sevoflurane or isoflurane and nitrous oxide will be utilized for maintenance of anesthesia once the ability to mask ventilate is confirmed. The lungs will be mechanically ventilated with a semi-closed circle system to maintain an end-tidal CO2 near 35 mmHg. Patients' lungs will be ventilated via anesthesia mask 100% oxygen until the patient is completely relaxed.

The size of the SGA device used will be based on manufacturer's recommendations and clinical evaluation of the anesthesiologist. The SGA device will be placed using standard technique and jaw lift will always be performed to aid in placement. The user will record ease of insertion on a scale (1-5) and number of insertions required will also be recorded. A new attempt is considered to begin if the tip of the cuff is withdrawn to the level of the lips. Accurate ventilation is achieved when the CO2 signal is rectangular and the mask is airtight at a respiratory pressure of up to 20 cm H2O. Time will be recorded from when the tip of the device cuff is at the mouth opening and stopped when first CO2 waveform is recorded.

Once ventilation is achieved, the patients in group A will be intubated through the shaft of Aura-I via the the Ambu aScope. If the epiglottis is down folded and obscuring optical view, jaw lift can be performed by an assistant to improve visualization of the cords. The aScope will be advanced until the carina is visualized and then the ETT is railroaded via the aScope into position (5cm above carina or cuff of ETT just below vocal cords). Once the ETT is successfully inserted, the cuff of the Aura-I will be deflated and the patient is ventilated via the ETT. If it is not possible to intubate, the ETT should be rotated 90° counterclockwise and jaw lift should be performed to help with intubation. If unsuccessful after two attempts, the anesthesiologist will proceed to intubate in standard fashion. The patients in group B will be intubated by ETT via the Intubating LMA as is standard procedure.

Once the procedure has finished and the patient is adequately reversed as determined by nerve stimulation, the cuff will be reinflated and the ETT will be removed. Ventilation will resume via the SGA. Once the ETT is withdrawn, the cuff will be adjusted to 60cm H2O using a cuff pressure manometer. The oropharyngeal leak pressure(OLP) is determined with a 60 cm H2O intracuff pressure by closing the expiratory spill valve and then closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a fixed gas flow of 3 L/min, without any respiration. The airway pressure at which equilibrium is reached and air leaks from the mouth or into the stomach, as sign of leak of the laryngeal mask is noted. Esophageal leak is determined by stethoscopy of the epigastrium and oropharyngeal leak is dectected listening for air leak over the mouth.

The peak airway pressure is not allowed to exceed 40 cmH2O. After OLP measurement and once the patient is adequately breathing on their own, the SGA can be removed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Supraglottic Airway

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AMBU Aura-I/aScope 2

First, the AMBU Aura-I LMA will be inserted. Then, the patient will be intubated with assistance of the AMBU aScope 2 disposable fiberoptic system.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AMBU Aura-I/aScope 2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Once ventilation is achieved, the patients in group A will be intubated through the shaft of Aura-I via the the Ambu aScope.

LMA Fastrach

The LMA Fastrach Single Use Laryngeal Mask Airway will be placed, followed by blind intubation using the LMA Fastrach EndoTracheal Tube.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LMA Fastrach Single Use

Intervention Type DEVICE

The patients in group B will be intubated by ETT via the Intubating LMA as is standard procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AMBU Aura-I/aScope 2

Once ventilation is achieved, the patients in group A will be intubated through the shaft of Aura-I via the the Ambu aScope.

Intervention Type DEVICE

LMA Fastrach Single Use

The patients in group B will be intubated by ETT via the Intubating LMA as is standard procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult surgical Candidates Aged 18-80 years
* ASA I-III
* Mallampati Score of I or II
* BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2
* Presenting for elective surgery
* Require General Endotracheal Anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously known difficult airway,
* Emergency status
* Require prone positioning
* Interincisor distance \< 2.5cm
* Thyromental distance \< 5cm
* Clinically suspected difficult airway
* Contraindications to LMA Insertion, such as Reflux disease
* Patients who do not require endotracheal intubation
* Indications for Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ambu A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carin A. Hagberg

Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carin A Hagberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Texas Medical School at Houston

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSC-MS-10-0604

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.