Does the Use of the GlideRite® Endotracheal Tube in Combination With the I-gel® Improve Intubation Success Rate?

NCT ID: NCT01265862

Last Updated: 2012-08-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim to compare two different types of supraglottic devices for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

The investigators hypothesis is that the use of the I-gel® supraglottic airway device associated with a GlideRite® endotracheal tube will result in an equal success rate of fiberoptic tracheal intubation when compared to the LMA-Fastrach® associated with a GlideRite® endotracheal tube. Time to intubate with the I-gel® device should also be shorter.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Supraglottic airway devices such as LMA-Fastrach® and I-gel® provide patent airways during general anesthesia.

The LMA-Fastrach® is designed to provide a conduit for blind or fiberscopically guided tracheal intubations. However, the success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt through this device varies between 50 and 87%.

The I-gel® is a newer device for airway management which, with its wide bore, allows direct passage of a tracheal tube. Recent studies suggest that the I-gel® is easy to insert and that limited experience is needed before a high success insertion rate is obtained. A recent study conducted in our center compared the LMA-Fastrach® to the I-gel® supraglottic airway device. Our results showed a lower success intubation rate in the I-gel® group. We noticed that there was a tendency for the endotracheal tube to impinge on the posterior and lateral aspect of the larynx. The endotracheal tube used for intubation in our study was a standard polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube. We believe that an endotracheal tube with a flexible tip(GlideRite®) would increase the intubation success rate through the I-gel® device. However, based on our clinical experience with the GlideRite® tube, blind tracheal intubation through the I-gel® airway device may be associated with a low success rate related to a lack of rigidity of its tip. Its use in combination with a fibrescope could compensate for this weakness. A recent study performed on mannequins showed a comparable success intubation rate of 99% for the I-gel® and LMA-Fastrach® when associated to a fibrescope.

In this prospective randomized study, we will compare the performance of the LMA-Fastrach® and the I-gel® associated with a GlideRite® endotracheal tube for fiberoptic tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation General Anesthesia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Tracheal intubation Supraglottic airway devices Patients undergoing general anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LMA-Fastrach® and GlideRite® tube

* Induction of general anesthesia with 1,5-2,5 mg/kg propofol and 1-3 mcg/kg fentanyl and neuromuscular relaxation with 0,6 mg/kg of rocuronium.
* Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification
* Insertion of LMA-Fastrach®, establishment of ventilation
* Evaluation of glottic view through LMA-Fastrach® using fibrescope
* Tracheal intubation with the GlideRite® tube through the LMA-Fastrach®
* With the endotracheal tube in place, the anaesthesiologist will proceed to the removal of supraglottic device

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tracheal intubation through LMA-Fastrach®

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device (LMA-Fastrach®) using a GlideRite® endotracheal tube

I-gel® and GlideRite® tube

* Induction of general anesthesia with 1,5-2,5 mg/kg propofol and 1-3 mcg/kg fentanyl and neuromuscular relaxation with 0,6 mg/kg of rocuronium.
* Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification
* Insertion of I-gel®, establishment of ventilation
* Evaluation of glottic view through I-gel® using fibrescope
* Tracheal intubation with the GlideRite® endotracheal tube through the I-gel®
* With the endotracheal tube in place, the anaesthesiologist will proceed to the removal of supraglottic device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tracheal intubation through I-gel®

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device (I-gel®) using a GlideRite® endotracheal tube

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tracheal intubation through LMA-Fastrach®

Tracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device (LMA-Fastrach®) using a GlideRite® endotracheal tube

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tracheal intubation through I-gel®

Tracheal intubation through a supraglottic airway device (I-gel®) using a GlideRite® endotracheal tube

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 and older
* Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4
* Contraindications to muscle relaxation
* Mouth opening less than 2 cm
* Patients at increased risk of regurgitation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nathalie Massicotte, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NM2011-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id