ILMA Fastrach Versus I-gel for Fiberoptic Tracheal Intubation

NCT ID: NCT00888875

Last Updated: 2014-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We evaluate feasibility of fiberoptic intubation through the "ILMA Fastrach" vs the "i-gel". Both are airway devices to be introduced in the mouth we the possibility to ventilate the patient and furthermore to be a guide to introduce a tracheal tube. We first insert either the ILMA or the i-gel. In a second step, we will introduce a tube through the device, all guided visually through a fiberoptic tool which works as a railroad for the tracheal tube.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ILMA Fastrach™ is a widely accepted and intensively investigated supraglottic airway device that is inserted blindly. It may be used to facilitate intubation and secure the airway in routine practice, in difficult airway scenarios or in emergency situations. Endotracheal tube insertion may be blind or fiberoptic scope guided, the latter raises the success rate. The i-gel™ is a newly developed supraglottic airway device and is also introduced blindly. Insertion of an endotracheal tube may be blind or fiberoptically guided.

So far, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing their performance are not yet published. There are case reports about intubating over the i-gel.

In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we are going to evaluate the performance of intubation through both devices. In 250 patients undergoing elective surgery, we will place either the ILMA or the i-gel according to randomization and then intubate with the help of a fiberoptic scope, using the specific ILMA tracheal tube or a normal tracheal tube for the i-gel. In order to remove the supraglottic airway devices, we will use the ILMA stabilizer rod.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tracheal Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Computer randomized insertion of the i-gel. Intubation fiberoptically of a tracheal tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

i-gel

Intervention Type DEVICE

insertion after induction of anaesthesia. Afterwards, intubation over the device fiberoptically

2

Computer randomized insertion of the i-gel. Intubation fiberoptically of a tracheal tube

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ILMA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insertion after Induction. Insertion of tracheal tube over device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

i-gel

insertion after induction of anaesthesia. Afterwards, intubation over the device fiberoptically

Intervention Type DEVICE

ILMA

Insertion after Induction. Insertion of tracheal tube over device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* elective operation with intubation
* ASA I-IV
* speaks German
* at least one predictor for difficult intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* weight \<30kg
* Risk Aspiration
* Risk bleeding orally
* known or highly suspected difficult mask ventilation
* Mouth opening \< 20mm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Greif, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Berne, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Fast igel1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.