Laryngeal Mask Supreme™ Versus the I-gel™

NCT ID: NCT00653237

Last Updated: 2014-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We evaluate two new developed airway devices, which provide patent airway during general anesthesia. In 60 patients undergoing elective general anesthesia, we will simulate a difficult airway by using an extrication device collar). We then place consecutively both airway devices in the mouth and check for ease of insertion and time used.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The LMA Supreme™ and the I-gel™ are both new developed supraglottic airway devices to provide patent airways during general anesthesia. So far, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing their performance are not yet published. Both devices can be used in difficult airway situations, pre-hospital and in the hospital. In this prospective, randomized, controlled cross-over trial, we are going to evaluate the performance of both devices in a simulated difficult airway scenario using an extrication collar to limit both mouth opening and neck movement. In a maximum total of 60 patients undergoing elective surgery, we will place both airway devices consecutively and ventilate the patients. First attempt success rate and time to success will be recorded. Secondary outcomes include oropharyngeal pressure leak, ease of gastric catheter insertion, adverse events and side effects. Our hypothesis is that no difference exists between the two devices. Our 0-hypothesis is that there is a difference

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients Undergoing Elective General Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

crossover trial. insertion of both devices consecutively, computer randomized order

Group Type OTHER

I-gel and LMA Supreme: supraglottic airway devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insertion of a supraglottic airway device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

I-gel and LMA Supreme: supraglottic airway devices

Insertion of a supraglottic airway device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Laryngeal Mask Supreme, supraglottic airway device

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA 1-3 patients undergoing elective operation

Exclusion Criteria

* Not speaking german or refusing to participate
* BMI \>35, \<50kg
* Planned operation time \>4h
* High risk of aspiration
* Cervical spine disease, known difficult airway, mouth opening \<20mm
* Upper respiratory tract symptoms in the previous 10 days
* Preoperative sore throat
* Poor dentition with high risk of damage
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Greif, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Berne, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

igellma-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.