Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation

NCT ID: NCT02411422

Last Updated: 2015-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption.

Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intubation using laryngoscope

Intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately.

Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used

* Conventional endotracheal tube
* Reinforced endotracheal tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional endotracheal tube

Reinforced endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reinforced endotracheal tube

i-gel blind intubation

i-gel blind intubation means that blind endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion.

i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately.

Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used

* Conventional endotracheal tube
* Reinforced endotracheal tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional endotracheal tube

Reinforced endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reinforced endotracheal tube

i-gel bronchoscopic intubation

i-gel bronchoscopic intubation means that bronchoscopic endotracheal intubation will be performed after i-gel insertion.

i-gel will be used as a conduit. we will check procedure time according to kind of endotracheal tube, separately.

Two kinds of endotracheal tube will be used

* Conventional endotracheal tube
* Reinforced endotracheal tube

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional endotracheal tube

Reinforced endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reinforced endotracheal tube

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional endotracheal tube

Conventional endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reinforced endotracheal tube

Reinforced endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* emergency physician
* work at emergency department more than 1 year.
* 50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* having backache or wrist pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Choi Hyun Young

emergency medicine fellowship

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-02-30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02277951 COMPLETED