Ramped Versus Supine Position for Emergent Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients; Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
NCT ID: NCT06924411
Last Updated: 2025-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-31
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Optimal head and neck positioning and clinical experience are important factors for successful endotracheal intubation in patients especially with a difficult airway. This study aims to investigate the rate of successful endotracheal intubation between ramped and supine positions in patients planned for intubation.
The ramped position, where the bed is kept half-flat and the head is elevated up to 35°, is planned to prove that it improves glottic view and facilitate intubation and ventilation.
Varying bed angles and heights during ramped position intubation may explain conflicting evidence regarding the effect of ramped position on intubation success in acute care settings.
Therefore, it seems that finding a simple alternative method for the classic supine technique that can create conditions like the proposed standard conditions for laryngoscopy would be a suitable solution for intubating patients with higher difficulty.
The patient's anatomy and the technique employed for laryngoscopy have a significant effect on the laryngeal view. The technique itself is influenced by a variety of factors including the laryngoscopic force and the skills, experience, and training of the physicians.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Upright Patient Positioning on Intubation Success
NCT02885298
Comparison of Glottic Views and Intubation Times in the Supine and 25 Degree Back-up Positions
NCT02934347
Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02411422
Head Position for Endotracheal Intubation
NCT02418741
Clinical Comparison Between Midline and Right-sided Insertion of the Videolaryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05635500
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supine group
Intubation in supine position
Direct Intubation
Direct laryngoscopy intubation
Ramped group
Intubation in ramped position
Direct Intubation
Direct laryngoscopy intubation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Direct Intubation
Direct laryngoscopy intubation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Aly Hashem
Resident doctor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Fawzy A Badawy
Role: CONTACT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-25-3-04MS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.