Ramped Versus Supine Position for Emergent Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients; Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study

NCT ID: NCT06924411

Last Updated: 2025-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-31

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endotracheal intubation is a life saving procedure for critically unwell and injured patients presenting to the emergency department. Prolonged time to successful intubation and multiple failed attempts are associated with a higher incidence of life-threatening adverse events such as hypoxia and hypotension.

Optimal head and neck positioning and clinical experience are important factors for successful endotracheal intubation in patients especially with a difficult airway. This study aims to investigate the rate of successful endotracheal intubation between ramped and supine positions in patients planned for intubation.

The ramped position, where the bed is kept half-flat and the head is elevated up to 35°, is planned to prove that it improves glottic view and facilitate intubation and ventilation.

Varying bed angles and heights during ramped position intubation may explain conflicting evidence regarding the effect of ramped position on intubation success in acute care settings.

Therefore, it seems that finding a simple alternative method for the classic supine technique that can create conditions like the proposed standard conditions for laryngoscopy would be a suitable solution for intubating patients with higher difficulty.

The patient's anatomy and the technique employed for laryngoscopy have a significant effect on the laryngeal view. The technique itself is influenced by a variety of factors including the laryngoscopic force and the skills, experience, and training of the physicians.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supine group

Intubation in supine position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Direct Intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy intubation

Ramped group

Intubation in ramped position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Direct Intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy intubation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct Intubation

Direct laryngoscopy intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Adult patients ≥18 years old and indicated for intubation with variable presentations.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unstable to be positioned in semi setting as spine trauma and polytraumatized patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Aly Hashem

Resident doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed A Hashem

Role: CONTACT

+201100074625 ext. Resident

Fawzy A Badawy

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Soh-Med-25-3-04MS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.