Clinical Comparison Between Midline and Right-sided Insertion of the Videolaryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation
NCT ID: NCT05635500
Last Updated: 2024-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
184 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2023-05-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
For Nasotracheal Intubation With Video Rigid Stylet, Which Nostril is Better?
NCT05218590
Awake Tracheal Intubation in Critical Care Patients
NCT05802316
Comparison of Two Bending Angles for Nasotracheal Intubation With a Malleable Vedio Stylet
NCT04459481
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891
Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury
NCT05619965
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In order to establish the above-mentioned generality, the patients are divided into 2 groups. In the preoperative visit, the patients are divided into easy and difficult airway, and a randomization regarding the induction technique is done paper-based after induction of anesthesia.
Patients\* identified in the preoperative visit with a risk for difficult intubation or difficult laryngoscopy (Mallampati ≥ 3, thyromental distance below 6.5cm, sternomental distance below 12.5cm, conversion from conventional laryngoscopy to VLS in the history, cervical spine immobilization, lack of possibility for reclination) are randomized into one of the two groups:
Group DR (difficult right) corresponds here to the right-sided insertion technique in the difficult airway.
Group DM (difficult middle) corresponds to the middle access route in the difficult airway.
Perioperatively, standard monitoring is performed according to the hospital's SOP, consisting of a 3-point ECG recording, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, pulse oximetry, respiratory gas monitoring and the recording of a processed EEG for hyponosis depth measurement. To ensure and document optimal muscle relaxation, we perform relaxometry.
In accordance with the hospital's internal SOP, anesthesia induction is performed after sufficient preoxygenation with opiates, hypnotics and muscle relaxants. All drugs are administered in accordance with the operation-specific, internal hospital standards.
In addition to the basic measures, the standardized, extended measures for the management of a difficult airway are all fulfilled in the DR and DM groups and documented by means of a checklist. These include optimized positioning and adequate depth of anesthesia, as well as the provision and use of various aids such as a guide rod or frovacatheter.
Prior to videolaryngoscopy, a mouth guard is inserted unless contraindicated for airway protection.
This is followed by videolaryngoscopy with insertion of the videolaryngoscope according to the assigned group, and then insertion of the endotracheal tube.
The visualization of the laryngeal plane using the Cormack/Lehane score, Video Classification of Intubation (VCI) score and the different process times of airway protection are documented in addition to the vital signs and train-of-four (TOF).
In addition to the video laryngoscope to optimize visualization, standardized advanced techniques for laryngoscopy as well as for intubation are used and documented if necessary.
In addition, the anatomic, pathologic, and other typical conditions that caused the current difficult intubation are documented.
The laryngoscopy including intubation is recorded via the VLS in the form of a video. This allows an assessment of the visual scores by an independent observer\*. Blinding cannot take place due to the different insertion techniques. The video recording only shows the inside of the mouth and larynx.
Side effects/complications are recorded on the 1st postoperative day by means of a short visit and standardized questionnaire according to localization (sore throat, hoarseness, mucosal lesions, dysphagia, dental damage) and differentiated according to the extent to which these complaints can be attributed to the surgical intervention and/or airway protection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Middle Insertion
Videolaryngoscope is inserted from the middle for endotracheal intubation.
Different Approach to endotracheal intubation.
Different insertion way.
Right Insertion
Videolaryngoscope is inserted from the right for endotracheal intubation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Different Approach to endotracheal intubation.
Different insertion way.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age ≥ 18 years
* indication for primary videolaryngoscopic Intubation (VLS) and/or at least one of the following criteria:
1. Mallampati ≥ 3
2. Thyromental distance \<6.5cm
3. Sternalomental distance \<12.5 cm
4. Conversion from conventional laryngoscopy to VLS in history
5. Cervical spine immobilization/lack of ability to recline.
Exclusion Criteria
* Participation in another prospective clinical intervention study within the last 30 days and during participation in this study
* Necessary Rapid Sequence Induction
* Indications of impossible mask ventilation and/or videolaryngoscopy (mouth opening \< 3.5 cm, ...)
* Existence of tracheal cannula prior to operation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sascha Treskatsch
Prof. Dr. med.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesia and operative intensive Care, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - University Hospital Berlin
Steglitz, State of Berlin, Germany
Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jiang L, Qiu S, Zhang P, Yao W, Chang Y, Dai Z. The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0876-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EA2/121/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.