A Predictive Model for Difficult Intubation

NCT ID: NCT02944305

Last Updated: 2017-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

7500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Failure in airway management is one of the most common anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Each individual airway assessment has limitation to predict difficult intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To develop a scoring model from multiple airway assessment to predict difficult intubation.

Methods: This will be a retrospective analytic study. All airway assessment data from medical records of patients aged more than 18 years old underwent general anesthesia in Srinagarind hospital from January 2012 to December 2014 will be used to develop a new scoring prediction model.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient with difficult intubation

Group 1: Patient undergoing endotracheal intubation with difficult intubation Group 2: Patient undergoing endotracheal intubation without difficult intubation

Endotracheal intubation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endotracheal intubation under direct laryngoscopy using McIntosh blade

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endotracheal intubation

Endotracheal intubation under direct laryngoscopy using McIntosh blade

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* Incomplete airway assessment in medical record
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Khon Kaen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thepakorn Sathitkarnmanee

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sirirat Tribuddharat, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University

Khon Kaen, Changwat Khon Kaen, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1290-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9416711 (View on PubMed)

Adnet F, Racine SX, Borron SW, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Lapostolle F, Cupa M. A survey of tracheal intubation difficulty in the operating room: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Mar;45(3):327-32. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045003327.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11207469 (View on PubMed)

Aktas S, Atalay YO, Tugrul M. Predictive value of bedside tests for difficult intubations. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(9):1595-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26004598 (View on PubMed)

Iohom G, Ronayne M, Cunningham AJ. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jan;20(1):31-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503000061.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12553386 (View on PubMed)

Merah NA, Foulkes-Crabbe DJ, Kushimo OT, Ajayi PA. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in a population of Nigerian obstetric patients. West Afr J Med. 2004 Jan-Mar;23(1):38-41. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v23i1.28079.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15171524 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HE581149

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.