Comparison of Different Bending Mode for Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation

NCT ID: NCT01605591

Last Updated: 2014-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to comparing the effects of different double-lumen endotracheal tube's bending type in tracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intubation with the double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) remains a great challenge for anesthesiologists. Although new upper airway devices, such as GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope, had been developed for facilitating airway management, the larger size and the complexity of DLT than single-lumen tube (SLT) makes the difficulties for DLT intubation. Therefore, the investigators designed this study to investigate the effects of different bending type of DLT in tracheal intubation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Intubation Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

the DLT bending to the right

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

the DLT bending to the right

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bending the bronchial lumen of DLT 60\~90 degrees in the same side with the tracheal lumen

the DLT bending to the left

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

the DLT bending to the left

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bending the bronchial lumen of DLT 60\~90 degree opposed to the tracheal lumen

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the DLT bending to the right

bending the bronchial lumen of DLT 60\~90 degrees in the same side with the tracheal lumen

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the DLT bending to the left

bending the bronchial lumen of DLT 60\~90 degree opposed to the tracheal lumen

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

different bending mode of DLT different bending mode of DLT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
2. more than 18 years of age
3. Receiving thoracic surgery with double-lumen endobronchial tube

Exclusion Criteria

1. risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration
2. history of gastroesophageal reflux
3. pregnancy
4. scheduled tracheostomy and postoperative prolonged ventilation in ICU
5. limited neck extension (\< 35°)
6. a thyromental distance less than 7 cm
7. a sternomental distance less than 12.5 cm with the head fully extended
8. mouth can not open
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hung-Te Hsu, VS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of anesthesia, Kaoshiung medical university hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

department of anesthesia, Kaohsiung medical university memorial hospital

Kaohsiung City, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hsu HT, Chou SH, Chou CY, Tseng KY, Kuo YW, Chen MC, Cheng KI. A modified technique to improve the outcome of intubation with a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Aug 18;14:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-72. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25206313 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KMUH-IRB-20110172

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.