Adequate Bending Angle of a Lightwand

NCT ID: NCT03693235

Last Updated: 2020-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-14

Study Completion Date

2019-09-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For tracheal intubation with a lightwand, adequate bending angle was not exactly investigated. The purpose of the study is compare three bending angles of lightwands for safe and efficient tracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lightwands are very useful device for difficult airway management due to small moth opening, weak teeth, and cervical spine instability. Experienced clinicians use a lightwand while bending it adequately. However, there has been not previous studies to investigate the adequate angle to bend it.

This randomized controlled trial is to compare three angles (70, 80, and 90 degrees) as bending angle of lightwands for safe and efficient tracheal intubation in cases which require the use of lightwands.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tracheal Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

70 degrees

During tracheal intubation using a lightwand, the tracheal tube combined with a lightwand will be bent by 70 degrees.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bending angle of a lightwand

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For tracheal intubation, investigators will bend the tracheal tube combined a lightwand by assigned angles (70, 80, or 90 degrees) for each patient. Next a practitioner will perform tracheal intubation with the bent tube.

80 degrees

During tracheal intubation using a lightwand, the tracheal tube combined with a lightwand will be bent by 80 degrees.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bending angle of a lightwand

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For tracheal intubation, investigators will bend the tracheal tube combined a lightwand by assigned angles (70, 80, or 90 degrees) for each patient. Next a practitioner will perform tracheal intubation with the bent tube.

90 degrees

During tracheal intubation using a lightwand, the tracheal tube combined with a lightwand will be bent by 90 degrees.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bending angle of a lightwand

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For tracheal intubation, investigators will bend the tracheal tube combined a lightwand by assigned angles (70, 80, or 90 degrees) for each patient. Next a practitioner will perform tracheal intubation with the bent tube.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bending angle of a lightwand

For tracheal intubation, investigators will bend the tracheal tube combined a lightwand by assigned angles (70, 80, or 90 degrees) for each patient. Next a practitioner will perform tracheal intubation with the bent tube.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who require use of a lightwand for tracheal tubes (i.e. small mouth opening, weak teeth, cervical spine instability)

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who refuse to participate the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jung-Man Lee

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jung-Man Lee, M.D., PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Agro F, Hung OR, Cataldo R, Carassiti M, Gherardi S. Lightwand intubation using the Trachlight: a brief review of current knowledge. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;48(6):592-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03016838.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11444456 (View on PubMed)

Chen J, Luo W, Wang E, Lu K. Optimal bent length of lightwand for intubation in adults: a randomized, prospective, comparative study. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1519-31. doi: 10.1177/147323001204000432.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22971505 (View on PubMed)

Davis L, Cook-Sather SD, Schreiner MS. Lighted stylet tracheal intubation: a review. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):745-56. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00044. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10702469 (View on PubMed)

Kim J, Im KS, Lee JM, Ro J, Yoo KY, Kim JB. Relevance of radiological and clinical measurements in predicting difficult intubation using light wand (Surch-lite) in adult patients. J Int Med Res. 2016 Feb;44(1):136-46. doi: 10.1177/0300060515594193. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26647074 (View on PubMed)

Szigeti CL, Baeuerle JJ, Mongan PD. Arytenoid dislocation with lighted stylet intubation: case report and retrospective review. Anesth Analg. 1994 Jan;78(1):185-6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199401000-00034. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8267162 (View on PubMed)

Won D, Lee JM, Lee J, Hwang JY, Kim TK, Chang JE, Kim H, Ma S, Min SW. A pilot study comparing three bend angles for lighted stylet intubation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 May 17;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01369-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34000987 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

30-2018-44

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nasal Ventilation vs Face Mask
NCT03853239 UNKNOWN NA