Retrograde Light Target Tracheal Intubation Technique:Clinical Comparison With Direct Pharyngoscopic Tracheal Intubation

NCT ID: NCT01116999

Last Updated: 2011-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators hypothesise that, for novices, light guided tracheal intubation will improve the time and success rate of this clinical skill compared to standard direct tracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The experiment was conducted under the close supervision of the coaching anesthesiologists in several stages.

The training stage: First of all, the operators received training with respect to the theories and principles of airway management, including techniques of bag-mask ventilation, Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation and light-guided and tracheal intubation until they had a good master about the theoretical background, technical risks and indications of the two techniques. Then, they had to receive manikin training of the two techniques on the Airway Management Trainer. Exposure of the glottis(EG)/tracheal intubation(TI) training would be continued before they were able to use both techniques to complete three consecutive cases of Exposure of the glottis/tracheal intubation operation successfully on the manikin trainer within 120 seconds (s) at a time.

20 medical workers were assigned to perform TI within 120s with either Direct laryngoscopy TI or light-guided TI technique, which was selected randomly and then converted to the alternative one until they complete 5 cases with each of the two techniques. The time of EG started from mouth opening of the patient to the exposure of the glottis. The time of TI also started from mouth opening of the patient to the completion of inserting the tracheal guide to the tracheal and sealing it with cuff inflation. The EG time, Cormack-Lehane (C\&L) grades, TI time, one-time success rate, and the overall success rate in using the two TI techniques were recorded.

The patient was laid in a supine position, with the head laid on a 7cm-high pillow for the sake of stability. The peripheral vein was accessed routinely and connected to a standard monitor for electrocardiography (ECG), SpO2 and noninvasive blood pressure (BP). Sufficient oxygen inhalation was initiated for \> 3min before induction of general anesthesia with midazolam, propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium bromide. The anesthesiologist was not allowed to give any instruction and suggestion or assistance to the operator during the whole process. The coaching anesthesiologist supervised the whole TI process closely. Should any hidden risk occur or the TI exceed the required time of the experiment, the TI attempt of the operator would be terminated and replaced by the anesthesiologist in order to ensure patients' safety: TI exceeded 120s; Attempt of TI exceeded 2 times; SpO2 decreasing to below 95%; appearance of unstable hemodynamic situations (mean BP or HR fluctuating by more than 25% of the baseline value); or occurrence of airway injury as evidenced by stained blood on the Macintosh Blade. Any patient with C\&L grade III\~IV as discovered by the anesthesiologist during TI would be excluded from the present study and replaced by anther patient to re-start the experiment. A 7.0- or 7.5-mm-ID endotracheal tube was used as the guide according to the patient's condition.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tracheal Intubation Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tracheal intubation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

light guided tracheal intubation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tracheal intubation light guided technique.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

light guided tracheal intubation

Tracheal intubation light guided technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

intubation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age range 18\~55 years
* general anesthesia
* ASA I\~II
* Mallampati Score grade I\~II
* thyromental distance ≥6cm
* mouth-open ≥3cm
* body mass index (BMI) ≤30kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* neck and maxillofacial surgeries
* temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disease
* potential risks for regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration
* in pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Military Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yang Tao

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tao Yang, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Jiong Hou, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Xiaoming Deng, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Xu Zhang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Wen Ni, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Xiaoyan Zhu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Second Military Medical University

Jinbao Li, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology and Cirtical Care Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19781007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id