Low Skill Fibreoptic Intubation I-gel vs Air-Q

NCT ID: NCT02663843

Last Updated: 2017-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2017-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia is the gold standard for securing the airway and for protecting the lungs against gastric aspiration. The conventional technique involves the use of a metal laryngoscope inserted into the mouth to create an air space, to allow insertion of an endotracheal tube.

Alternatively, an oral airway device (called a supraglottic device (SGD)) can be used for tracheal intubation. The SGD is first inserted. A fibrescope is inserted down the shaft of the SGD and into the trachea. This allows an endotracheal tube (previously pre-loaded onto the fibrescope) to be railroaded of the fibrescope and into the trachea. This technique is called 'low skill fibreoptic intubation' as the SGD acts as a guide for the fibrescope. Our study compares the performance of two SGD: i-gel and air-Q. The investigators will compare intubation success rate, insertion rate, and times for SGD insertion and intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators are testing to see if fibreoptic intubation in patients via a supraglottic airway device i.e. 'low skill fibreoptic intubation' (LSFOI) is more successful via the i-gel® than in the air-Q®. Patients are those scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia who would normally require tracheal intubation. The investigator's hypothesis is based on the results of the investigator's recent manikin study (CIRB 2014/2039). The investigators would like to see if this hypothesis translates to patients. It will also test secondary outcomes e.g. SGD insertion success rates and times, and intubation times. In the aforementioned manikin study, the air-Q® performed better with the SGD insertion rates and times. However, the i-gel® performed better with intubation success rates and times. The devices may perform different due to differences between the devices: design (shape, volume, length, aperture), material composition, and technique required for insertion and intubation.

24 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in the major operating theater of Singapore General Hospital will be enrolled. The patient will then be randomised in equal proportions into two groups, either the air-Q® or i-gel®. Patients will undergo induction of general anaesthesia in a standardised fashion and in accordance with usual practice in the investigator's department of anaesthesia. Intubation will then proceed with the assigned airway device. Data collected will include successful endotracheal intubation, as evidenced by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide on a capnograph. Time to intubation (from the initial handling of the airway device until successful intubation is confirmed with successful lung ventilation), the number of attempts required and the view achieved (according to the modified Cormack and Lehane scoring system) will also be recorded. Injuries to the lips, teeth or upper airway will be sought and documented by a blinded observer in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit.

A protocol will be provided to standardise the induction of general anaesthesia. This will involve the application of standard patient monitors, a period of pre-oxygenation, and administration of anaesthetic agents and muscle relaxants. If the patient desaturates to SpO2 \< 94% during intubation, the intubation attempt via either the air-Q® or i-gel® will be abandoned and intubation will proceed using the conventional direct laryngoscope.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

i-gel airway

I-gel inserted for the low skill fibreoptic intubation technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

i-gel airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fibreoptic intubation via i-gel airway device

air-Q airway

Air-Q inserted for the low skill fibreoptic intubation technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

air-Q airway

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fibreoptic intubation via air-Q airway device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

i-gel airway

Fibreoptic intubation via i-gel airway device

Intervention Type DEVICE

air-Q airway

Fibreoptic intubation via air-Q airway device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a physical status of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I/II and over 21 years old, having elective surgery, who require endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA class III/IV
* Patients with history of previous difficult endotracheal intubation
* Patients with two or more predictors of difficult airway management (criteria 1-8, below)

1. Airway masses
2. Mallampati (oropharygneal space grading) III or IV
3. Thyromental distance \< 6.5cm
4. Inter-incisor distance \< 3 cm
5. Head extension \< 30 degrees
6. Edentulous
7. Large beard
8. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) or snorer
* Patients needing a rapid sequence induction
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Singapore General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patrick Wong, Patrick

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Singapore General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Singapore General Hospitals

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patrick Wong, MBBS FRCA

Role: CONTACT

+6563214220

Hairil RB Abdullah, MBBS MMED

Role: CONTACT

+6563214220

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patrick Wong, FRCA

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Lloyd LJ, Subash F, Wilkes AR, Hodzovic I. A comparison of fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through the Ambu (R) Aura-i , the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel : a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2015 May;70(5):591-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.12988. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25631299 (View on PubMed)

Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q((R)) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66(12):1093-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21880031 (View on PubMed)

Moon HS, Lee JY, Chon JY, Lee H, Kim D. Air-Q(R)sp-assisted awake fiberoptic bronchoscopic intubation in a patient with Ludwig's angina. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Dec;67(Suppl):S23-4. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.S.S23. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25598892 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1601LSFOI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

I-gel Plus Comparison Study
NCT07125677 RECRUITING NA