A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT ID: NCT03908775
Last Updated: 2020-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-15
2020-04-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The C-MAC videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is a videolaryngoscope using a modified Macintosh blade, which may be a useful alternative both for routine and difficult airway management and for educational purposes.
In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, the purpose is to compare C-MAC and DL in terms of intubation times, hemodynamic response and adverse events associated with nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing dental procedures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation During Pediatric Dental Surgery
NCT04677894
The Comparison of Direct Macintosh Laryngoscopy and HugeMed Video Laryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation in Children
NCT05121597
Effect Of Position On Laryngeal Visualisation With The C-Mac Videolaryngoscope
NCT03709979
A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children
NCT02827123
Glidescope Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children
NCT03326882
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The C-MAC videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is a videolaryngoscope using a modified Macintosh blade, which may be a useful alternative both for routine and difficult airway management and for educational purposes.
In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, the purpose is to compare C-MAC and DL in terms of intubation times, hemodynamic response and adverse events associated with nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing dental procedures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group VL
C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Patients intubated with C-MAC Videolaryngoscope
C-MAC videolaryngoscope
An intubating device that is used for nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing dental interventions. Nasotracheal intubation was applied by anesthesiologist with C-MAC videolaryngoscope.
Group DL
Direct Laryngoscope Patients intubated with Direct laryngoscope
Direct Laryngoscope
An intubating device that is used for nasotracheal intubation. Nasotracheal intubation was applied by anesthesiologist with direct laryngoscope.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
C-MAC videolaryngoscope
An intubating device that is used for nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing dental interventions. Nasotracheal intubation was applied by anesthesiologist with C-MAC videolaryngoscope.
Direct Laryngoscope
An intubating device that is used for nasotracheal intubation. Nasotracheal intubation was applied by anesthesiologist with direct laryngoscope.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiology score I-II,
* undergoing dental procedure
* required nasotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
* Upper airway abnormalities
* Known difficult airways
3 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Inonu University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ülkü Özgül
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulku Ozgul
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Inonu University Faculty of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Inonu University
Malatya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim HJ, Kim JT, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. A comparison of GlideScope((R)) videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Apr;21(4):417-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03517.x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UlkuNT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.