Is HugeMed Video Laryngoscope Superior to McGrath in Pediatric Patients

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Videolaryngoscopes improve laryngeal visualization in children under 3 years. In this study we aimed to compare Hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscopes regarding their Cormach-Lehane (CL) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores. Furthermore, tracheal intubation success rates, need for cricoid pressure and optimization maneuvers, and hemodynamic changes are compared.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Comparison of McGrath, Pentax and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal Intubation in Pediatrics

NCT02828631

Intubation Time Intubation Difficulty Scale

COMPLETED NA

A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation

NCT03908775

Intubation Videolaryngoscopy Children

COMPLETED NA

A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children

NCT02827123

Anesthesia, Endotracheal

COMPLETED NA

Glidescope Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children

NCT03326882

Anesthesiology Pediatrics

COMPLETED NA

Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

NCT02482870

Respiratory Failure Intubation

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The group of patients (Group M, n=20) was intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope.

Before intubation, Cormack-Lehane score and percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score were recorded by applying direct and indirect laryngoscopy with the Macgreth videolaryngoscope. All tracheal intubations were performed by the same expert with over 10 years of experience in pediatric anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hugemed Videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

After general anesthesia induction, the first group of patients (Group M, n=20) was intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope. For the second group (Group H, n=20), the Hugemed videolaryngoscope was used. Patients were intubated using one of the appropriate blades numbered 1, 2, or 3 based on their height, weight, and age.

For the group (Group H, n=20), the Hugemed videolaryngoscope was used.

Patients were intubated using one of the appropriate blades numbered 1, 2, or 3 based on their height, weight, and age. After the induction of general anesthesia, patients underwent direct and indirect laryngoscopy with videolaryngoscopes. The Modified Cormack-Lehane score and Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score were recorded, and orotracheal intubation was performed. Number of attempts, need for cricoid pressure, optimization maneuvers, success rate, and hemodynamic parameters of both groups were recorded.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hugemed Videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

After general anesthesia induction, the first group of patients (Group M, n=20) was intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope. For the second group (Group H, n=20), the Hugemed videolaryngoscope was used. Patients were intubated using one of the appropriate blades numbered 1, 2, or 3 based on their height, weight, and age.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hugemed Videolaryngoscope

After general anesthesia induction, the first group of patients (Group M, n=20) was intubated with the McGrath videolaryngoscope. For the second group (Group H, n=20), the Hugemed videolaryngoscope was used. Patients were intubated using one of the appropriate blades numbered 1, 2, or 3 based on their height, weight, and age.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mc Grath Videolaryngoscope

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

total of 40 elective surgical patients under the age of 3, classified as ASA 1-3 risk group, who underwent general anesthesia with no anticipated difficult airway.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who could not obtain parental consent, those classified as ASA 4 and above, individuals with serious cardiac and respiratory problems, and patients anticipated to have a difficult airway were not included in the study.

Minimum Eligible Age

6 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

3 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes