Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Manual In-line Stabilization
NCT ID: NCT03516539
Last Updated: 2018-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-11
2018-07-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Mcgrath is known to provide excellent laryngeal visibility even in case of anticipated-difficult and anticipated-unsuccessful intubation as well as normal airway management. However, compared with direct laryngoscopy, the success rate of intubation and the time required for anticipated difficult intubation have been reported conflicting results in previous studies. The aim of this study was to compare the intubation success rate, the intubation time and the ease of use with Mcgrath video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy during intubation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02051400
Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Insertion of a Double Lumen Tube by Residents
NCT03710096
A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT01516164
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT02267759
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin by Novice
NCT03161730
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Transoral endotracheal intubation is performed using Mcgrath videolaryngoscope (Group ML) and direct laryngoscope (Group DL) using manual in-line stabilization. At this time, the time required for intubation is measure by other medical personnel not engaged in this research.
3. The anesthesiologist assesses Cormack Lehane laryngeal visual field,external laryngeal manipulation, intubation difficulty scales (IDS) and the difficulty of intubation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group ML
Mcgrath videolaryngoscopy
Group ML
Mcgrath videolaryngoscope
Group DL
direct Macintosh laryngoscope
Group DL
Macintosh laryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group ML
Mcgrath videolaryngoscope
Group DL
Macintosh laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hallym University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yi Hwa Choi, Dr
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Halllym university Sacred Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rai MR, Dering A, Verghese C. The Glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jan;60(1):60-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04013.x.
Asai T, Murao K, Shingu K. Training method of applying pressure on the neck for laryngoscopy: use of a videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2003 Jun;58(6):602-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03207_7.x. No abstract available.
Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope--an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;54(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03022777.
Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):116-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem303. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-I043
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.