Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT ID: NCT01814176
Last Updated: 2016-12-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
2 main forces - a 'lifting' force to elevate the structures not in the line of sight and a force exerted by the user's wrist to counterbalance the torque effect of the tongue tissues on the blade
Intubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
The GlideScope has a 60ยบ angulation anteriorly at the distal portion of the blade, allowing an anterior view of the larynx.
Intubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* elective surgery
* single lumen endotracheal intubation required
* signed informed consent
* one risk factor for a difficult laryngoscopy ( Mallampati score \>3, inter-incisor gap \< 3.5cm, thyromental distance \< 6.5cm, sternomental distance \< 12.5cm, reduced neck extension and flexion)
Exclusion Criteria
* anesthesiologist declines to consent
* contraindication to neuromuscular blockade
* ASA 4
* rapid sequence intubation
* previous failed intubation
* other method of intubation indicated eg fiberoptic intubation, awake tracheostomy
* symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux
* cervical spine instability
* unstable hypertension and symptomatic coronary artery disease
* cerebrovascular disease or raised intracranial pressure
* oral/pharyngeal/laryngeal carcinoma
* loose teeth/poor dentition
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cordovani D, Russell T, Wee W, Suen A, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;36(3):221-226. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000901.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-0229-B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id