Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope

NCT ID: NCT01814176

Last Updated: 2016-12-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During Anesthesia many patients require that a breathing be inserted into their windpipe. This is usually achieved using a direct laryngoscope, consisting of a retraction blade with a light near its end. When achieving a direct line-of-sight to the windpipe is difficult, more force is often applied, resulting in greater patient stress. A GlideScope video laryngoscope uses a camera and light source to see the windpipe. This enables the user to see objects that may not be in the direct line-of-sight. This likely results in less force being required, reducing patient stress. Because such stresses are often confounded by patient variables, we are comparing the forces required by the direct and video laryngoscopes on patients with at least one risk factor for difficulty, by directly measuring these with special sensors attached to the laryngoscope blades.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Moderately Difficult to Intubate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope

2 main forces - a 'lifting' force to elevate the structures not in the line of sight and a force exerted by the user's wrist to counterbalance the torque effect of the tongue tissues on the blade

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

GlideScope Video Laryngoscope

The GlideScope has a 60ยบ angulation anteriorly at the distal portion of the blade, allowing an anterior view of the larynx.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 18years
* elective surgery
* single lumen endotracheal intubation required
* signed informed consent
* one risk factor for a difficult laryngoscopy ( Mallampati score \>3, inter-incisor gap \< 3.5cm, thyromental distance \< 6.5cm, sternomental distance \< 12.5cm, reduced neck extension and flexion)

Exclusion Criteria

* lack of patient consent
* anesthesiologist declines to consent
* contraindication to neuromuscular blockade
* ASA 4
* rapid sequence intubation
* previous failed intubation
* other method of intubation indicated eg fiberoptic intubation, awake tracheostomy
* symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux
* cervical spine instability
* unstable hypertension and symptomatic coronary artery disease
* cerebrovascular disease or raised intracranial pressure
* oral/pharyngeal/laryngeal carcinoma
* loose teeth/poor dentition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cordovani D, Russell T, Wee W, Suen A, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;36(3):221-226. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000901.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30308524 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11-0229-B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id