Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in Infants Undergoing Neurosurgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT04153370
Last Updated: 2020-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-05
2020-02-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We compared the Airtraq, Glidescope, and c-mac video laryngoscopes during intubation of \<1 year old children undergoing neurosurgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT04153357
Glidescope Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children
NCT03326882
Intubation on a Paediatric Manikin by Emergency Staff: a Comparison of Airtraq and Glidescope
NCT02478203
Intubation With Storz Videolaryngoscope® Versus Airtraq® - in an Infant Population
NCT01090726
Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old
NCT01488370
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: We enroll 20 patients age under 1 year old undergoing neurosurgery in this prospective randomized study. We compared the Airtraq, Glidescope, and c-mac video laryngoscopes during intubation of \<1 year old children undergoing neurosurgery regarding intubation times and intubation success rates.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intubation time airtraq
inserting the device through the oral cavity till the visualization of the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords
Airtraq
airtraq video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant
intubation time glidescope
inserting the device through the oral cavity till the visualization of the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords
glidescope
glidescope video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant
intubation time c-mac
inserting the device through the oral cavity till the visualization of the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords
c-mac
c-mac video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Airtraq
airtraq video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant
glidescope
glidescope video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant
c-mac
c-mac video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* undergoing neurosurgery
* ASA 1-2
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA 3-4
* emergency
1 Year
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kocaeli University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zehra Ipek ARSLAN
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kocaeli University Medical Faculty
Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KOU KAEK 2015/311
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.