Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-01
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
NCT04833166
Comparison of C-Mac D Blade and Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway on Cervical Spine Motion Conditions
NCT03115606
Macintosh Blade Size for Endotracheal Intubation in Operative Rooms
NCT06232837
C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion
NCT06759038
C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion
NCT03567902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An incidence of major complications in airway management of 1 in 5,500 was estimated in the Fourth National Audit Project in the UK.
Therefore, our aim was to compare intubation conditions regarding the modified Cormack \& Lehane score (CL) between the D-Blade® in indirect laryngoscopy or Macintosh blade in direct and indirect laryngoscopy with C-MAC PM® in a simulated setting of a difficult airway in human subjects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
All patients received the same treatment.
1. Laryngscopy with C-MAC PM + Macintosh blade
2. Laryngscopy with C-MAC PM + D-Blade
3. Intubation with C-MAC PM + D-Blade
Macintosh blade
Laryngoscopy with C-MAC PM in combination with Macintosh blade
D-Blade
Laryngoscopy with C-MAC PM in combination with D-Blade
Intubation
Intubation with C-MAC PM in combination with D-Blade
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Macintosh blade
Laryngoscopy with C-MAC PM in combination with Macintosh blade
D-Blade
Laryngoscopy with C-MAC PM in combination with D-Blade
Intubation
Intubation with C-MAC PM in combination with D-Blade
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* undergoing urgent or emergent surgery
* non-fasted
* American Society of Anesthesiology Class (ASA) IV-VI
* no consent for participation
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. med. Florian Raimann
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Haitham Mutlak, Dr. med.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Frankfurt
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Raimann FJ, Dietze PE, Cuca CE, Meininger D, Kessler P, Byhahn C, Gill-Schuster D, Zacharowski K, Mutlak H. Prospective Trial to Compare Direct and Indirect Laryngoscopy Using C-MAC PM(R) with Macintosh Blade and D-Blade(R) in a Simulated Difficult Airway. Emerg Med Int. 2019 Apr 1;2019:1067473. doi: 10.1155/2019/1067473. eCollection 2019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
126/11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.