A Comparison of a Macintosh Laryngoscope and Endotracheal Tube Introducer in a Manikin

NCT ID: NCT03419507

Last Updated: 2018-03-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-10

Study Completion Date

2018-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this prospective, randomized, cross-over study, investigators aimed to compare the first pass successes of inexperienced doctors with Macintosh laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube introducer on a manikin with continuous chest compression in the ambulance simulation in the pre-hospital process.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective, cross-over manikin study which is based on an ambulance simulation. Written inform consent was obtained from all doctors who agreed to participate to the study. Inexperienced doctors who attended in Kocaeli between February 2018 and March 2018 will be included to the survey. Novice doctors participated to this research. The research will be carried out in the department of emergency medicine of Derince training and research hospital. In order to prevent bias, the eight-hour training module for the participants , theoretical and practical airway training will be provided by an emergency medical specialist who has no knowledge about the research.

The participants will be informed about the study after the training. Doctors who participate to the study will be included after the written inform consent is obtained. The participants will be informed about the research, but they will be blind to the specific purposes of the study. The participants will practice for 5 minutes on the manikin by themselves and with the emergency medicine specialist if they ask for. Life / form® Deluxe Crisis ™ Manikin Torso with Advanced Airway Management will be used as the research manikin. The participants will perform airway interventions in the sitting position and the height of the stretcher will be set at the same height with the ambulance stretcher. Practitioner's seat will be set on the same height with the ambulance seat. 8.0 (mm ID) endotracheal tube will be used for the procedure. Endotracheal tube and manikin airway will be lubricated with pump spray lubricant provided with the simulator. Airway manikin will be in supine position. Lund University Cardiac Arrest System-version 2 (LUCAS 2TM) automatic chest compression device will be used to provide 5 cm compression depth and 100 chest compressions per minute in order to provide standardization in chest compression and prevent bias created by practitioners. The airway devices will be next to the model's head.

The study was planned as a randomized, crossover clinical trial to reduce the influence of the learning. Equal numbers 1 and 2 will be written on the same sized papers to provide randomization. All papers will be folded in the same way and placed inside brown and invisible envelopes. All of the envelopes will be placed in the same box. After the training, every doctor will be asked to choose one of the envelopes. After separating the participants into two groups, doctors that drawed envelop number 1 will be asked to intubate by using only No. 3 Macintosh blade. The doctors that drawed envelop number 2 will be asked to intubate with the adult size endotracheal tube introducer with using No. 3 Macintosh laryngoscopy.

After the groups completed their interventions, those who drawed envelope number 1 will be asked to intubate with Macintosh laryngoscopy using endotracheal tube introducer and those who drawed envelope number 2 will be asked to intubate with Macintosh laryngoscopy. Each doctor will be given 1 minute for each successful intervention. Each practitioner will make maximum 2 trial attempts for each method. The initiation time is considered to be taking the laryngoscopy on hand. After ventilation, the manikin's chest wall movement is considered as a successful intervention. All transactions will be recorded with a camera that is placed in the room and the participants will have the information about the presence of the camera. The first intervention success , intubation time, the number of interventions of the participants will be recorded. After the interventions are over, the participants will be asked to rate the difficulty of the ventilation methods according to the Likert scale as 1-very easy, 2-easy, 3-medium, 4-difficult 5- very difficult. In addition, they will be asked whether they have any experiences with Macintosh laryngoscopy or endotracheal tube introducer and their responses will be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Equal numbers 1 and 2 will be written on the same sized papers. After separating participants into two groups, doctors that drawed envelop number 1 will be asked to intubate with No. 3 Macintosh laryngoscopy and doctors that drawed envelop number 2 will be asked to intubate with endotracheal tube introducer. Than groups will be changed.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The doctors will be informed about the research, but they will be blind to the specific purposes of the study

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Macintosh group

After separating participants into two groups, doctors that drawed envelop number 1 will be asked to intubate with laryngoscope by using No. 3 Macintosh laryngoscope

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Macintosh laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

The doctors who drawed envelope number 1 will asked to intubate with using No. 3 Macintosh blade

Endotracheal tube introducer group

After separating participants into two groups, doctors that drawed envelop number 2 will be asked to intubate with laryngoscope by using the adult size endotracheal tube introducer with using No. 3 Macintosh laryngoscope.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endotracheal tube introducer

Intervention Type DEVICE

The doctors that drawed envelop number 2 will be asked to intubate with laryngoscope by the adult size, endotracheal tube introducer with using No. 3 Macintosh blade

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endotracheal tube introducer

The doctors that drawed envelop number 2 will be asked to intubate with laryngoscope by the adult size, endotracheal tube introducer with using No. 3 Macintosh blade

Intervention Type DEVICE

Macintosh laryngoscopy

The doctors who drawed envelope number 1 will asked to intubate with using No. 3 Macintosh blade

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* novice doctors who accept to participate the study

Exclusion Criteria

* novice doctors who won't accept to participate the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Derince Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hüseyin Cahit Halhallı

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Derince training and educational hospital

Kocaeli, Derince, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Murat I, Constant I, Maud'huy H. Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children: a database of 24,165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Feb;14(2):158-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01167.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14962332 (View on PubMed)

Bhananker SM, Ramamoorthy C, Geiduschek JM, Posner KL, Domino KB, Haberkern CM, Campos JS, Morray JP. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: update from the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest Registry. Anesth Analg. 2007 Aug;105(2):344-50. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268712.00756.dd.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17646488 (View on PubMed)

Fiadjoe JE, Nishisaki A, Jagannathan N, Hunyady AI, Greenberg RS, Reynolds PI, Matuszczak ME, Rehman MA, Polaner DM, Szmuk P, Nadkarni VM, McGowan FX Jr, Litman RS, Kovatsis PG. Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jan;4(1):37-48. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00508-1. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26705976 (View on PubMed)

Jabre P, Combes X, Leroux B, Aaron E, Auger H, Margenet A, Dhonneur G. Use of gum elastic bougie for prehospital difficult intubation. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;23(4):552-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.12.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16032630 (View on PubMed)

Kidd JF, Dyson A, Latto IP. Successful difficult intubation. Use of the gum elastic bougie. Anaesthesia. 1988 Jun;43(6):437-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06625.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3407866 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/the-difficult-pediatric-airway

The difficult pediatric airway - UpToDate \[Internet\]. Jul 31. 2017

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017/16. 15/351

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.