MedDataX Logo

Evaluation of Techniques for Tracheal Tube Exchange in Standard and Critical Care Patients

NCT ID: NCT04158271

Last Updated: 2019-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-22

Study Completion Date

2019-12-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled study to evaluate different Techniques and Approachs for the Exchange of a tracheal tube or supraglottic airway device in a Simulator

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Exchanging a tracheal tube (ETT) in the high-risk difficult airway patient carries the risk of hypoxemia and the potential of a lost airway. Maintaining continuous airway access during the exchange by incorporating an airway exchange catheter (AEC) or similar device may reliably lessen exchange risk, especially in the known or suspected difficult airway patient, by providing a conduit to facilitate ETT passage into the trachea. We evaluated some approven / etablished techniques in a Simulator based study design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Morbidity

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Airway Management Tube Exchange

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prone Position

Evaluation of Techniques for tracheal tube Exchange in prone position

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prone Position

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients in prone position

Laryngeal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in patients with a failed laryngeal tube

Endotracheal tube Leackage

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients with a endotracheal tube and a cuff leackage

Laryngeal tube

Evaluation of Techniques for tracheal tube Exchange in patients with laryngeal tube (LT)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prone Position

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients in prone position

Laryngeal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in patients with a failed laryngeal tube

Endotracheal tube Leackage

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients with a endotracheal tube and a cuff leackage

Endotracheal tube Leackage

Evaluation of Techniques for tracheal tube Exchange in critical care patients with a endotracheal tube and a high leackage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prone Position

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients in prone position

Laryngeal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in patients with a failed laryngeal tube

Endotracheal tube Leackage

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients with a endotracheal tube and a cuff leackage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prone Position

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients in prone position

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laryngeal tube

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in patients with a failed laryngeal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endotracheal tube Leackage

In a randomized order we evaluate techniques for securing the airway in paralyzed patients with a endotracheal tube and a cuff leackage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* residents and consultans of the Department of Anesthesiology

Exclusion Criteria

* no
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marc Kriege, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc Kriege, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg-University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JohannesGUU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id