Can Endotracheal Tube Fluctuation With Epigastric Compression Be Used as a Confirmation Method for Endotracheal Intubation?

NCT ID: NCT06542406

Last Updated: 2024-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-18

Study Completion Date

2023-03-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endotracheal intubation (ETE) may also need to be performed outside the hospital as advanced airway management. In such cases, facilities such as imaging methods, ultrasound or capnography may not be available and only traditional methods such as auscultation of lung sounds, auscultation of the epigastric region without hearing airflow, observation of chest expansion after ventilation, observation of water vapor in the tube may have to be used. Despite all these observational methods and equipment used, it is recommended to keep in mind that there may be errors and to try to provide confirmation with more than one method.

Especially in disaster situations where technological infrastructure is not available and sometimes outside the hospital, the use of traditional methods based on examination may be of vital importance. The traditional methods mentioned above are mostly used to detect tracheal localization and to exclude esophageal localization. In our observations in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest, the investigators noticed that in the case of esophageal placement of the tube, manual compression of the epigastric region produced a fluctuation in the tube and valved balloon caused by airflow. The investigators thought that this could be a method to confirm esophageal placement. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of epigastric manual compression in the confirmation of esophageal placement of the tube.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who underwent ETE outside the hospital or in the first hour of arrival to the emergency department were evaluated after the procedure. Out-of-hospital ETE was performed by experienced paramedics working in the emergency ambulance service, and ETE in the emergency department was performed by emergency medicine residents or emergency medicine specialists with at least 2 years of emergency department experience. Out-of-hospital procedures were performed at the first visit to the emergency department, and procedures performed in the emergency department were confirmed by ETE immediately after the procedure.

Confirmation was performed single-blind by emergency medicine specialists with at least 5 years of experience, without knowing who performed the procedure and where (in or out of the hospital). Confirmation was performed by auscultation of lung sounds (from the anterior and lateral sides of both lungs, upper and lower zones), evaluation of equal participation of both thoraxes in breathing by inspection, auscultation of the epigastric region, placement of capnography, monitoring of water vapor in the tube, manual compression of the epigastric region at least three times and evaluation of fluctuation in the tube, and pulse oximetry monitoring.

Epigastric compression was performed by applying pressure to the epigastric region at least three times with the volar side of the intubated patient while the patient was ventilated with a balloon-valved mask. During this procedure, the fluctuation of the air and fluid in the stomach inside the esophageal tube can be observed and its sound can be heard. It can be applied from the first inhalation.

The ultrasonography (USG) procedure was evaluated by placing a linear ultrasound probe \[SonoSite M-Turbo linear probe (13-6 MHz), Sonosite, Inc, Bothell, WA, USA\] in the transverse position on the anterior side of the neck, just above the suprasternal notch, and observing the position of the tube (presence of a double path sign) and pleural sliding movement. While a single semicircular echogenic area is observed when the tube is in the trachea, a second semicircular echogenic area is observed when the tube is located in the esophagus. USG was performed immediately after the ETE procedure. In patients in whom double pathway sign was observed and pleural sliding motion was not observed, the patient was re-intubated by the experienced specialist performing USG. It was confirmed by USG again. These procedures were categorized as "failed".

partial endtidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) measurement by capnography was performed using a mainstream EMMA® Capnograph (PHASEIN AB Svärdvägen, Danderyd, Sweden) for intubated patients. It was assessed by the detection of PETCO2 greater than 5 mmHg after five breaths and the appearance of a typical square waveform.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation, Intratracheal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endotracheal intubation

Patients admitted to the emergency department between 01/05/2021 and 30/05/2022, who were older than 18 years of age and who underwent ETE outside the hospital or within the first hour of arrival to the emergency department were included in the study.

Group Type OTHER

Endotracheal intubation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The first 40 successful and the first 40 unsuccessful ETE procedures were included in the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endotracheal intubation

The first 40 successful and the first 40 unsuccessful ETE procedures were included in the study.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 18 years of age
* Underwent ETE outside the hospital or within the first hour of arrival to the emergency department

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients in whom ETE was previously confirmed by USG or PETCO2,
* Patients intubated at external centers
* Patients who had known airway stenosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duzce University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

kudret selki

Researcher Assistant in Emergency Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mustafa Boğan, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Duzce University, School of Medicine, Emergency Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duzce University

Düzce, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Farrokhi M, Yarmohammadi B, Mangouri A, Hekmatnia Y, Bahramvand Y, Kiani M, Nasrollahi E, Nazari-Sabet M, Manoochehri-Arash N, Khurshid M, Mosalanejad S, Hajizadeh V, Amani-Beni R, Moallem M, Farahmandsadr M. Screening Performance Characteristics of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Endotracheal Intubation; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 26;9(1):e68. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1360. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34870234 (View on PubMed)

Li X, Zhang J, Karunakaran M, Hariharan VS. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for the confirmation of endotracheal tube intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Ultrason. 2023 Mar 30;25(1):72-81. doi: 10.11152/mu-3594. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36780595 (View on PubMed)

Kramer-Johansen J, Dorph E, Steen PA. Detection of carbon dioxide in expired air after oesophageal intubation; the role of bystander mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Jan;52(1):155-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01503.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17999713 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DuzceUniversityEM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment of Pediatric Challenging Airway
NCT06443424 NOT_YET_RECRUITING