King Vision vs Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Intubation Time in Novice Users

NCT ID: NCT07174050

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluated two different devices used for placing a breathing tube (endotracheal intubation) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. The aim was to compare the King Vision videolaryngoscope, which has a camera and a guiding channel for the tube, with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope, which allows doctors to look directly at the vocal cords. The study focused on how long it takes to successfully insert the tube, the need for additional maneuvers during the procedure, and the overall success rate of first attempts. The procedures were performed by novice operators under supervision.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Management Endotracheal Intubation Tracheal Intubation, Elective Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group K

Channelled blade of KVVL

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

King Vision Channeled Video Laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

King Vision Videolaryngoscope (KVVL) is one of the new indirect laryngoscopes with disposable (either with channeled or non-channeled) blades .Both designs include an anti-fog lens coating . The channelled KVVL has a rigid blade with an integrated channel for introducing the endotracheal tube. The height and width of the standard non-channeled and channeled blades are 13 mm and 26 mm vs 18 mm and 29 mm, respectively. The KVVL has a unique design and high-quality image . It has a camera that enables a clear view of the glottis. It is a solid, portable, battery-operated device with an organic LED display for video laryngoscopy . It allows better glottis visualization and Cormack Lehane score than DL. Compared with Airtraq, the KVVL has wide field of view (160° vs 80° respectively) and potentially shortens the time to tracheal intubation .

Group M

Macintosh laryngoscope

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Macintosh Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

In clinical practice, direct laryngoscopy (DL) with either a curved (Macintosh) or straight (Miller) blade is a well-known and reliable technique in the hands of an experienced operator.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

King Vision Channeled Video Laryngoscope

King Vision Videolaryngoscope (KVVL) is one of the new indirect laryngoscopes with disposable (either with channeled or non-channeled) blades .Both designs include an anti-fog lens coating . The channelled KVVL has a rigid blade with an integrated channel for introducing the endotracheal tube. The height and width of the standard non-channeled and channeled blades are 13 mm and 26 mm vs 18 mm and 29 mm, respectively. The KVVL has a unique design and high-quality image . It has a camera that enables a clear view of the glottis. It is a solid, portable, battery-operated device with an organic LED display for video laryngoscopy . It allows better glottis visualization and Cormack Lehane score than DL. Compared with Airtraq, the KVVL has wide field of view (160° vs 80° respectively) and potentially shortens the time to tracheal intubation .

Intervention Type DEVICE

Macintosh Laryngoscopy

In clinical practice, direct laryngoscopy (DL) with either a curved (Macintosh) or straight (Miller) blade is a well-known and reliable technique in the hands of an experienced operator.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (≥18 years old) scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
* Mallampati airway classification I-II
* Written informed consent obtained from the patient

Exclusion Criteria

* Predicted or known difficult airway: Mallampati III-IV, inter-incisor distance \<2.5 cm, thyromental distance \<6 cm, limited cervical spine mobility
* History of difficult intubation or need for awake/rapid-sequence intubation
* Upper airway pathology (tumour, trauma, infection), limited mouth opening, or craniofacial anomalies
* Emergency surgery, high aspiration risk, or full stomach
* Severe cardiopulmonary instability (e.g., shock, severe hypoxaemia)
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* BMI \>35 kg/m² (if your protocol excludes obesity; remove if not applicable)
* Participation refusal or inability to consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Izmir City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hitit University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Murat KAYKAC

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Izmir City Hospital

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/5

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KINGVISON1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.