Comparsion of King Vision® Standard Blade and King Vision® Channeled Blade in Patients Scheduled for Tracheal Intubation
NCT ID: NCT02344030
Last Updated: 2018-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
King Vision vs Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Intubation Time in Novice Users
NCT07174050
A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
NCT03230422
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294
Comparison of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Airway Management
NCT03571295
Comparison of SensaScope Intuboscope and McGrath Series 5 for Endotracheal Intubation
NCT02348736
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
standard blade
Standard Blade: tracheal intubation with standard blade
channeled blade
In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve
standard blade
In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve
channeled blade
Channeled Blade: tracheal intubation with channeled blade
channeled blade
In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve
standard blade
In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
channeled blade
In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve
standard blade
In a randomised trial we measure the time for ventilation by means of endtidale CO2 Curve
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* capacity to consent
* Present written informed consent of the research participant
* Elective surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Existing pregnancy
* Lack of consent
* inability to consent
* emergency patients
* Emergency situations in the context of a Difficult Airway Management
* ASA classification\> 3
* situations where the possibility of accumulated gastric contents
* Participation in another study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Kriege, MD
Marc Kriege, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc Kriege, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University JG, Mainz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Murphy LD, Kovacs GJ, Reardon PM, Law JA. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope. J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
Akihisa Y, Maruyama K, Koyama Y, Yamada R, Ogura A, Andoh T. Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1666-9. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
Kriege M, Alflen C, Noppens RR. Using King Vision video laryngoscope with a channeled blade prolongs time for tracheal intubation in different training levels, compared to non-channeled blade. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 31;12(8):e0183382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183382. eCollection 2017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JohannesGUKV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.