Comparison of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Airway Management

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators intended to evaluate first success rate and learning curve of trainee anesthetists performing direct and videolaryngoscopy in pediatric airway management.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.

NCT03230422

Airway Complication of Anesthesia

COMPLETED NA

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Ambu (aBlade) System for Use in Children

NCT02841189

Pediatric Anesthesia King Vision Video Laryngoscope Intubation

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Two Blades of Videolaryngoscope in Simulated Difficult Airway in Children

NCT03719638

Intubation;Difficult

COMPLETED NA

Airway Management Study to Evaluate the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope as an Alternative to the Direct Laryngoscopy

NCT01122433

Unexpected Difficult Airway

COMPLETED NA

Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric Anesthesia

NCT03747250

Tracheal Intubation Morbidity

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After obtaining written informed consent of 10 trainee anesthetists with non less than 24 months and not exceeding 60 months residency, use of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope was demonstrated by presenting a 2 min instruction video. First endotracheal intubation by each trainee anesthetist was randomly allocated to either direct (DL) or King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscopy (KingVL). Then order of laryngoscopy type was alternating at least each trainee anesthetists performed 10 DL and 10 KingVL endotracheal intubations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Management Videolaryngoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

videolaryngoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

King Vision aBlade

Intervention Type DEVICE

endotracheal intubation performed with King Vision aBlade

direct laryngoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

direct laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

endotracheal intubation performed with direct laryngoscopy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

King Vision aBlade

endotracheal intubation performed with King Vision aBlade

Intervention Type DEVICE

direct laryngoscopy

endotracheal intubation performed with direct laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA 1 to 2
* written informed consent from both legal guardians
* children who were scheduled for nonemergency surgery with requirement of endotracheal intubation