Videolaryngoscopy at Unanticipated Difficult Airway

NCT ID: NCT06972394

Last Updated: 2025-05-16

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 143 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-01-01
• Study Completion Date: 2025-04-01

Brief Summary

Glottic visualization, intubation success, complications and accidental esophageal intubation rate of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) were compared in patients with UDA.

Detailed Description

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University (25-MOBAEK-124). Data were collected by reviewing hospital automation systems, patient records, and difficult airway forms for patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia and experienced unanticipated difficult airway (UDA) between January 2020 and March 2025. Patients with incomplete data, a prior history of difficult airway, or preoperative findings indicating a difficult airway were excluded from the study. Demographic variables-including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, and ASA scores-as well as airway examination findings such as Mallampati scores and Cormack-Lehane grades, were analyzed. Additionally, intubation methods, instruments used, and challenges encountered during airway management were evaluated. The effects of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) on glottic visualization, intubation success, and complication rates were also compared.

In the relevant clinic, preoperative airway evaluation is performed by assessing the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, inter-incisor gap and angle, neck circumference, atlanto-occipital joint mobility, upper lip bite test, retrognathia, prominent upper incisors, high and narrow palate, macroglossia, hoarseness, dyspnea on exertion, and history of difficult airway. In patients without any predictors of difficult airway, routine intubation is performed using DL in the sniffing position. The management of patients with UDA is conducted according to a specific institutional protocol. In appropriate cases where mask ventilation and oxygenation can be maintained, a hyper-angulated C-MAC® D-Blade videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is used as a rescue technique in patients who cannot be intubated using DL. If tracheal intubation cannot be achieved with videolaryngoscopy or other methods and the patient is awakened, and if the surgical procedure still requires general anesthesia, awake intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is planned.

Conditions

Difficult Airway; Videolaryngoscopy

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: OTHER
• Study Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Patients with unanticipated difficult airway

In the present study, the records of patients with unanticipated difficult airway in the clinic were retrospectively reviewed. The aim was to compare the effects of direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy on glottic visualization, intubation success, and complications in patients with unanticipated difficult airway.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients aged 18 to 90 years
• Patients with unanticipated difficult airway

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with missing data
• Patients with a history of difficult airway
• Patients with signs of difficult airway on preoperative evaluation

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 90 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Ali Genc

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Tokat Province, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

25-MOBAEK-124

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id