Study: Study to Compare Video Miller Device to Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01371032
Last Updated: 2021-09-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
the standard pediatric intubation instrument (Miller blade) used as direct laryngoscopy during tracheal intubation to the VideoMiller device (the standard pediatric blade with a camera attached, giving indirect view of the vocal cords in the screen). This intubation device is used to place the tube in the trachea to keep the patient breathing during the surgery procedure.
The anesthesiologist obtains a better view of the vocal cords looking at the screen provided by the VideoMiller.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study
NCT02991820
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103
King Vision Video Laryngoscope aBlade vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Children
NCT02384564
A Comparison Between Two Video Laryngoscopes,in Successfully Intubating Pediatric Mannequins w/wo Difficult Airways
NCT02198742
KingVision Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy - Equivalence Trial
NCT02590237
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Video-Miller laryngoscope
using the screen (Video laryngoscopy group)
VideoMiller
Video-Miller laryngoscope, using the screen (Video laryngoscopy group)
Direct laryngoscopy
without use the screen (Direct laryngoscopy group)
Direct Laryngoscopy
Video-Miller laryngoscope, without screen (Direct laryngoscopy group)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VideoMiller
Video-Miller laryngoscope, using the screen (Video laryngoscopy group)
Direct Laryngoscopy
Video-Miller laryngoscope, without screen (Direct laryngoscopy group)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Obtaining signed the informed consent by their parents or legal guardian.
3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I - II or III
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with facial abnormalities, and/or oral-pharyngeal malformation.
3. Emergency operation
3 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Roya Yumul, M.D.,PhD.
Residency program director, Department of anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roya Yumul, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Ronald H Wender, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cedars Sinai Medical center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lingappan K, Neveln N, Arnold JL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 12;5(5):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00024542
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.