VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study

NCT ID: NCT02991820

Last Updated: 2018-07-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the CMAC and Glidescope videolaryngoscopes (VL) to traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL) using either a Miller or Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of users. This will involve the use of an intubating pediatric manikin to assess various aspects of endotracheal intubation by experienced and inexperienced users.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The commonly used method for endotracheal intubation in children is direct laryngoscopy using a Miller or Macintosh blade. Videolaryngoscopy is a widely accepted pediatric airway management. Videolaryngoscopes (VL) provide an indirect view of glottis without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal, and glottis structures. Some types of VLs provide also direct view of glottis with indirect view. Videolaryngoscopes can be used as a teaching tool for learners as they can visualize all the anatomical structures of larynx at the same time with the performer. VLs may facilitate the learning of endotracheal intubation in inexperienced users in the pediatric population. There are limited data on the use of videolaryngoscopes by anesthesia providers and medical personnel who are inexperienced in the use of videolaryngoscopes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Videolaryngoscopes (VL) Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) Inexperienced Users

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inexperienced users

Inexperienced users will include trainees (SRNAs, residents, fellows, and medical students) and nurses at NCH.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miller

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using direct laryngoscopy (DL) with a Miller laryngoscope

Macintosh

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using DL with a Macintosh laryngoscope

C-MAC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the C-MAC video laryngoscope

GlideScope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the GlideScope video laryngoscope

Experienced users

Experienced users will include faculty pediatric anesthesiologists CRNAs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Miller

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using direct laryngoscopy (DL) with a Miller laryngoscope

Macintosh

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using DL with a Macintosh laryngoscope

C-MAC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the C-MAC video laryngoscope

GlideScope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the GlideScope video laryngoscope

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Miller

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using direct laryngoscopy (DL) with a Miller laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Macintosh

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using DL with a Macintosh laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

C-MAC

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the C-MAC video laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

GlideScope

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the GlideScope video laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Faculty pediatric anesthesiologists
* CRNAs
* Trainees (SRNAs, residents, fellows, and medical students)
* Nurses from NCH

Exclusion Criteria

* If subjects are unwilling to participate.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Joseph D. Tobias

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joseph D. Tobias

Chairman, Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph Tobias, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB16-00549

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.