Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Success Rates Using Video Laryngoscopes in Entrapped Patients - a Manikin Study

NCT ID: NCT01182740

Last Updated: 2010-11-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will compare the success rates of endotracheal intubation in a simulated entrapped car accident victim (manikin) using different video laryngoscopes by experienced emergency physicians.

The investigators hypothesized that video laryngoscopes may improve success rates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endotracheal Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

glidescope

No interventions assigned to this group

storz c-mac

No interventions assigned to this group

mcgrath vl

No interventions assigned to this group

ambu pentax aws

No interventions assigned to this group

macintosh laryngoscope

No interventions assigned to this group

others

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* experienced emergency physicians

Exclusion Criteria

* no experience in out-of-hospital emergency medicine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cologne

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Cologne

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, Teschendorf P, Hellmich M, Genzwurker HV, Hinkelbein J. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):849-58. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834c7c7f.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21986981 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-183

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id