KingVision Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Ambu KingVision videolaryngoscope performs as well as direct laryngoscopy for intubating small children and infants.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

King Vision Video Laryngoscope aBlade vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Children

NCT02384564

Tracheal Intubation

UNKNOWN NA

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Ambu (aBlade) System for Use in Children

NCT02841189

Pediatric Anesthesia King Vision Video Laryngoscope Intubation

COMPLETED NA

King Video Laryngoscope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT02208349

Respiratory Failure

TERMINATED NA

Standard Versus Hyperangulated Video Laryngoscopy Blades for Intubation in Neonates and Small Infants

NCT05843565

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

COMPLETED NA

Study: Study to Compare Video Miller Device to Direct Laryngoscopy

NCT01371032

Surgeries Undergoing General Anesthesia

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare the Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy using the Miller Blade Laryngoscope.

The primary outcome of the study will be time to successful intubation. Other outcomes of clinical relevance such as first attempt success rates of intubation, grade of laryngeal view, percentage of glottic opening, number of insertion attempts, hemodynamic responses, and complications will also be assessed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tracheal Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Direct Laryngoscopy

The trachea will be intubated via direct laryngoscopy using a traditional straight blade (Miller) laryngoscope.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Miller Direct Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

At time of tracheal intubation, the subject will be intubated using a Miller blade laryngoscope. The first attempt to successful intubation will be assessed. The Cormack Lehane and Percentage of Glottic Opening scores will be recorded. Information on time to glottic view, time to removal of the blade, and time of first capnography upstroke (successful intubation) will be recorded. Other parameters measured will be information on subsequent attempts, ease of tracheal tube insertion, and hemodynamic responses for 5 minutes.

KingVision Video Laryngoscope

The trachea will be intubated using the Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope size 1 pediatric blade.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope aBlade

Intervention Type DEVICE

At time of tracheal intubation, the subject will be intubated using the Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope with a size 1 aBlade. The first attempt to successful intubation will be assessed. The Cormack Lehane and Percentage of Glottic Opening scores will be recorded. Information on time to glottic view, time to removal of the blade, and time of first capnography upstroke (successful intubation) will be recorded. Other parameters measured will be information on subsequent attempts, ease of tracheal tube insertion, and hemodynamic responses for 5 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope aBlade

At time of tracheal intubation, the subject will be intubated using the Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope with a size 1 aBlade. The first attempt to successful intubation will be assessed. The Cormack Lehane and Percentage of Glottic Opening scores will be recorded. Information on time to glottic view, time to removal of the blade, and time of first capnography upstroke (successful intubation) will be recorded. Other parameters measured will be information on subsequent attempts, ease of tracheal tube insertion, and hemodynamic responses for 5 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Miller Direct Laryngoscopy

At time of tracheal intubation, the subject will be intubated using a Miller blade laryngoscope. The first attempt to successful intubation will be assessed. The Cormack Lehane and Percentage of Glottic Opening scores will be recorded. Information on time to glottic view, time to removal of the blade, and time of first capnography upstroke (successful intubation) will be recorded. Other parameters measured will be information on subsequent attempts, ease of tracheal tube insertion, and hemodynamic responses for 5 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients at Lurie Children's Hospital undergoing surgery/procedure where intubation is indicated
* American Society of Anesthesiology Class I-III patients