King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
NCT ID: NCT02324465
Last Updated: 2019-04-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-04-30
2017-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
King Video Laryngoscope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02208349
Comparison Study of the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision
NCT02316769
King Vision® and GlideScope® in Difficult Airways
NCT03685968
Video-Laryngoscope Alone or With Bronchoscope for Predicted Difficult Intubation
NCT03080896
Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
NCT02482870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although similar in many respects, the King Vision and Glidescope systems have differing designs which may result in differences in speed and success in the management of routine and/or difficult airways.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
King Vision Video Laryngoscope
The patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the King Vision VL
King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
The patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the Glidescope VL
Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Doug Hester
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Douglas Hester, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
130470
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.