Comparison Study of the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, the investigators compare the effectiveness of two relatively new video laryngoscopes, McGrath MAC (Covidien, Dublin Ireland) and the King Vision (King Systems, Noblesville, IN), by practitioners experienced in airway management but with limited exposure to these two devices. Our hypothesis was that, the McGrath MAC device would require fewer intubation attempts and shorter intubation times than the King Vision when performed by novice users.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope to McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope for Nasal Intubation

NCT03129399

Nasal Intubation

UNKNOWN NA

McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope

NCT02292901

Tracheal Intubation

TERMINATED NA

Nasal Intubation Using King Vision Video Laryngoscopy

NCT03126344

Nasal Intubation

COMPLETED NA

Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope

NCT02051400

Intubation; Difficult

COMPLETED NA

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

NCT02324465

Difficult Intubation

TERMINATED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Video Laryngoscopic Device Usage in Novice Users

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

King Vision video laryngoscope

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope

Patient intubated with the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

McGrath MAC video laryngoscope

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intubation with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

King Vision video laryngoscope

Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

McGrath MAC video laryngoscope

Intubation with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All interested airway providers (Residents, Attendings, Certified Nurse Anesthetist and
* Student Registered Nurse Anesthetist) will be eligible to be included. -

Exclusion Criteria

* All patients with difficult airways as determined by history or physical exam (limited oral opening, limited cervical extension, receding chin, Mallampati class III or IV).

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes