Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-15

Study Completion Date

2019-02-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Several videolaryngoscopes have been developed but few have been compared in terms of their learning curves and efficacy. The aim of this study is to compare the learning curves of Airtraq versus King Vision in a group of residents trained in direct laryngoscopy. Four residents will perform, after a short training in manikin, 8 intubations with each device. The sequence of use of the devices will be randomized. Outcome measures will be duration of intubation attempt, glottic visualization and percentage of intubation success.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Learning Curve of Endobronchial Intubation Using Video Laryngoscopes

NCT04689269

Endobronchial Intubation

UNKNOWN NA

The Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laringoscopy for Residents Intubation Study

NCT06842082

Intubation Intratracheal Airway Management

RECRUITING NA

A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management

NCT02395419

Endotracheal Intubation

UNKNOWN NA

A Study of Laryngoscopic Vision With the TotalTrack Device Versus Indirect Laryngoscopy

NCT03208140

Airway Obstruction Difficult Intubation

COMPLETED

Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation

NCT05428995

Intubation

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Laryngoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy

Intubation attempts using Airtraq device.

Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Attempt to intubation using the Airtraq device

King Vision indirect laryngoscopy

Intubation attempts using King Vision device

King Vision indirect laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Attempt to intubation using the King Vision device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy

Attempt to intubation using the Airtraq device

Intervention Type DEVICE

King Vision indirect laryngoscopy

Attempt to intubation using the King Vision device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-II.
* Elective surgery.
* General anesthesia required.

Exclusion Criteria

* Bronchoaspiration risk.
* Pharmacological allergies.
* Craniofacial anomalies.
* Body mass index \> 30.
* Prior history of airway management complications.
* Presence of clinical signs predictive of difficult intubation.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No