Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology

NCT ID: NCT03265938

Last Updated: 2020-07-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-13

Study Completion Date

2019-07-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients who undergo general anesthesia for surgical procedures frequently need to have a breathing tube placed ("tracheal intubation") for the duration of the procedure. Most often airway management is routine for an experienced anesthesiologist. Less often, airway management can be difficult and can result in patient harm. In order to reduce risk, anesthesiologists routinely evaluate patients' airways by obtaining a relevant history and doing a physical exam, which can aid in predicting which airways may be difficult to manage. The "gold standard" for management of the anticipated difficult airway is to perform an awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation after anesthetizing the airway with local anesthesia. This affords added safety because the airway remains patent and the patient breaths spontaneously until a tracheal tube is secured, at which point general anesthesia can be induced.

Recently, authors have advocated for alternative methods of management of the predicted difficult airway, most commonly by using a video laryngoscope to perform the awake intubation. A video laryngoscope provides an indirect view of the larynx using a camera at the tip of a rigid laryngoscope. It takes less training to gain and maintain proficiency compared to flexible bronchoscopy.

Previous studies that have shown successful awake intubation with video laryngoscopy in the predicted difficult airway have not included patients with head and neck pathology, including malignancies or a history of head and neck surgery or radiation. In this study, the study team will perform video laryngoscopy in patients with head and neck pathology who require awake bronchoscopic intubation for surgery after placement of the tracheal tube and induction of anesthesia. The study team hypothesize that it will be difficult to obtain a good view of the larynx with video laryngoscopy in some patients with head and neck pathology. If there is a significant incidence of difficult video laryngoscopy in this patient population, it will reinforce that anesthesiologists need to continue to learn and maintain skills in bronchoscopic intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Indirect laryngoscopy

Head and neck pathology patients undergoing indirect laryngoscopy. Patients with a past medical history of active or previously treated head and neck pathology.

Indirect Laryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

The attending anesthesiologist will perform video laryngoscopy with the C-MAC D video laryngoscope and with the GlideScope AVL video laryngoscope and grade the view of the larynx obtained with each laryngoscope.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Indirect Laryngoscopy

The attending anesthesiologist will perform video laryngoscopy with the C-MAC D video laryngoscope and with the GlideScope AVL video laryngoscope and grade the view of the larynx obtained with each laryngoscope.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Glidescope AVL Indirect Laryngoscopy C-MAC D-Blade Indirect Laryngoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age\> 18 years old
* Presence of oral, pharyngeal or laryngeal mass or history of surgery or radiation for head and neck cancer
* Requiring awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation for surgery
* Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency Procedure
* Presence of one or more loose teeth
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jaime B Hyman

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jaime Hyman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23364566 (View on PubMed)

Ahmad I, Bailey CR. Time to abandon awake fibreoptic intubation? Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):12-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13333. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26684527 (View on PubMed)

Kramer A, Muller D, Pfortner R, Mohr C, Groeben H. Fibreoptic vs videolaryngoscopic (C-MAC((R)) D-BLADE) nasal awake intubation under local anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2015 Apr;70(4):400-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25764403 (View on PubMed)

Rosenstock CV, Thogersen B, Afshari A, Christensen AL, Eriksen C, Gatke MR. Awake fiberoptic or awake video laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1210-6. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318254d085.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22487805 (View on PubMed)

Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182023eb7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21150569 (View on PubMed)

Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21447488 (View on PubMed)

Fiadjoe JE, Litman RS. Difficult tracheal intubation: looking to the past to determine the future. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1181-2. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318254d0a0. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22487804 (View on PubMed)

Popat MT, Srivastava M, Russell R. Awake fibreoptic intubation skills in obstetric patients: a survey of anaesthetists in the Oxford region. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2000 Apr;9(2):78-82. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.1999.0361.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15321093 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GCO 17-0963

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Video Laryngoscope, New Intubation Device
NCT02095470 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3