Optimal Head and Neck Position During Videolaryngoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02558036

Last Updated: 2018-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-11

Study Completion Date

2017-04-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Optimal patient head and neck position when performing videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation has not yet been established.The investigators aim to assess the effect of two different positions on the laryngeal view obtained and success of tracheal intubation during videolaryngoscopy with two commercially available and well established videolaryngoscopes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The optimum patient head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy (when the anaesthetist views the larynx with a curved metallic blade before passing a tube for ventilation of the lungs) is traditionally considered to be the "sniffing the morning air" (neck flexion and head extension) position. This has been questioned previously as there is no randomized controlled study to date to explore this statement. The patient should be optimally positioned prior to induction of anaesthesia, especially because in the event of an unexpected difficult intubation, the Difficult Airway Society guidelines suggest the use of an alternative laryngoscope. In current clinical practice a videolaryngoscope (a curved blade with a camera attached to it that allows the anaesthetist to see around corners) has been used as an alternative laryngoscope. To the best of our knowledge, the ideal patient position for videolaryngoscopy has not yet been described. The intubation time and rate of success at intubation using a C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope was previously assessed by Serocki et al, but only in the sniffing position. It is possible that adopting a different position when using the C-Mac D- Blade might result in a superior view of the larynx. Furthermore, the optimal patient position has not yet been assessed for intubation with the King Vision videolaryngoscope.

This key information could gain precious seconds in a difficult airway scenario (when securing the airway with a tube for ventilation proves difficult) and has obvious implications for patient management. The answer to this question could also help the anaesthetists take informed decisions when using videolaryngoscopy to intubate the trachea in elective settings. The investigators aim to assess the effect of two different positions on the laryngeal view obtained during videolaryngoscopy with two commercially available and well established videolaryngoscopes to try and answer this question.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Head and Neck Position for Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

C-Mac D-Blade Neutral Position

C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope with patients head and neck in neutral position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type OTHER

Using C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned the neutral Head and Neck Position

C-Mac D-Blade Sniffing Position

C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope with patients head and neck in sniffing position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type OTHER

Using C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in Sniffing Head and Neck Position

King Vision Neutral Position

King Vision videolaryngoscope with patients head and neck in neutral position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

King Vision Videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type OTHER

Using the King Vision Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in the neutral Head and Neck Position

King Vision Sniffing Position

King Vision videolaryngoscope with patients head and neck in sniffing position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

King Vision Videolaryngoscope

Intervention Type OTHER

Using the King Vision Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in Sniffing Head and Neck Position

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope

Using C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned the neutral Head and Neck Position

Intervention Type OTHER

C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope

Using C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in Sniffing Head and Neck Position

Intervention Type OTHER

King Vision Videolaryngoscope

Using the King Vision Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in the neutral Head and Neck Position

Intervention Type OTHER

King Vision Videolaryngoscope

Using the King Vision Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in Sniffing Head and Neck Position

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients aged 18 and above, presenting for elective surgical procedure and requiring tracheal intubation will be invited to take part in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are refusing to take part, below 18 years of age, pregnant women, American society of anaesthesiologists' class 4 and above, those requiring rapid sequence indication, super morbidly obese (BMI \>50) and those patients requiring awake fibreoptic intubation will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cyprian Mendonca

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Consultant

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

Coventry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

El-Orbany M, Woehlck H, Salem MR. Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jul;113(1):103-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821c7e9c. Epub 2011 May 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21596871 (View on PubMed)

Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, Denantes C, Lefebvre L, Galinski M, Martinez C, Cupa M, Lapostolle F. Randomized study comparing the "sniffing position" with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Oct;95(4):836-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200110000-00009.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11605921 (View on PubMed)

Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dorges V, Cavus E. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Feb;79(2):121-9. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23032922 (View on PubMed)

Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1290-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9416711 (View on PubMed)

Greenland KB, Edwards MJ, Hutton NJ. External auditory meatus-sternal notch relationship in adults in the sniffing position: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):268-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep390. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20086071 (View on PubMed)

Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15527629 (View on PubMed)

Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;59(3):165-75.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22050948 (View on PubMed)

Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S, Mandal S, Martin J, Mills J, Navani N, Rahman NM, Wrightson JM, Munavvar M; British Thoracic Society Bronchoscopy Guideline Group. British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax. 2013 Aug;68 Suppl 1:i1-i44. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203618. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23860341 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

178075

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.