Comparison of Three Laryngoscopes in Difficult Laryngoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02387502

Last Updated: 2015-05-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tracheal intubation requires alignment of oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal axes. When these three axes are not aligned, intubation becomes difficult. In the researchers' study, the investigators simulated difficult laryngoscopy situation by using a rigid neck collar. This neck collar renders intubation difficult not only by restricting neck movement, but also reducing mouth opening. The investigators compared the performance of Macintosh, MacCoy and Airtraq laryngoscope in simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Airtraq laryngoscope is an optical laryngoscope which allows visualization of vocal cord as a reflected image through multiple lenses and prisms. MacCoy laryngoscope is a modification of Macintosh laryngoscope. It has a lever which, when pressed, moves its flexible tip. In the investigators' study, the researchers compared the performances of Airtraq laryngoscope with MacCoy and Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. The researchers recruited 120 patients and randomly divided those patients into three equal groups i.e. 30 patients in each group. These three groups are 1-Airtraq, 2-MacCoy and 3-Macintosh. The researchers compared efficacy and safety in these three laryngoscopes. The researchers compared efficacy in terms of time of intubation, ease of intubation, overall success, Intubation difficulty score, visualization of vocal cord in terms of POGO (percentage of Glottic Opening) score. The researchers compared safety in terms of hemodynamic pressor response and airway trauma.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation; Difficult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope

40 patients were intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope after simulating difficult laryngoscopy using rigid neck collar.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intubation- Macintosh laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Difficult intubation was simulated by using rigid neck collar. Then patients were intubated according to the assigned laryngoscopes. In Macintosh group, tip of the laryngoscope blade was placed in the vallecula and epiglottis was lifted. After visualization of the vocal cord, patients were intubated.

Intubation with MacCoy laryngoscope

40 patients were intubated with MacCoy laryngoscope after simulating difficult laryngoscopy using rigid neck collar.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intubation- MacCoy laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

In MacCoy group, tip of the laryngoscope blade was placed in the vallecula and lever was pressed to flex the tip. After visualization of the vocal cord, patients were intubated.

Intubation with Airtraq laryngoscope

40 patients were intubated with Airtraq laryngoscope after simulating difficult laryngoscopy using rigid neck collar.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intubation- Airtraq laryngoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

In Airtraq group, the laryngoscope was loaded with endotracheal tube. Airtraq laryngoscope was inserted through midline and after visualization of image of vocal cord through its eyepiece, endotracheal tube was passed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intubation- Macintosh laryngoscope

Difficult intubation was simulated by using rigid neck collar. Then patients were intubated according to the assigned laryngoscopes. In Macintosh group, tip of the laryngoscope blade was placed in the vallecula and epiglottis was lifted. After visualization of the vocal cord, patients were intubated.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intubation- MacCoy laryngoscope

In MacCoy group, tip of the laryngoscope blade was placed in the vallecula and lever was pressed to flex the tip. After visualization of the vocal cord, patients were intubated.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intubation- Airtraq laryngoscope

In Airtraq group, the laryngoscope was loaded with endotracheal tube. Airtraq laryngoscope was inserted through midline and after visualization of image of vocal cord through its eyepiece, endotracheal tube was passed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II.
* Posted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and tracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with anticipated difficult airway
* obese (body mass index (BMI)\>30) patients
* patients with risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents
* pregnant patients
* patients with airway distortion or trauma.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Government Medical College, Haldwani

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bikramjit Das

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Geeta Bhandari, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, G.M.C. Haldwani

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

123-IEC/01/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.