Comparison of the Satiety Effect of a Very Low Energy Foam With Normal Energy Foams

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare, in a randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study the satiety effect of a very low energy aerated beverage with normal energy aerated beverages in healthy subjects.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effect of Liquid Volume and the Amount of Incorporated Gas Into a Carbohydrate/Protein Beverage on Satiety

NCT02405494

Satiety Appetite

COMPLETED NA

The Effect of Sensory-enhanced Beverages on Satiety Following Repeated Exposures

NCT02097927

Healthy Subjects

COMPLETED NA

The Effects of Processed Whole Orange on Subjective Ratings of Satiety

NCT02116023

Self Reported Ratings of Hunger

COMPLETED NA

Effects of Viscous Fibre Containing Foods on Satiety (Gel Form)

NCT02134938

Obesity

UNKNOWN PHASE1

Tolerance and Appetite Reduction of a Nutritional Solution With Intragastric Gelation Properties

NCT07127198

Weight Management

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of this study is to assess if a very low energy foam has the same effect on satiety as the same volume of a reference normal energy foam, by testing for equivalence of these two foams. Treatment equivalence, is met if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of between-treatment differences in appetite AUC is within the range of -5 to +5 mm/min of the reference . Two other normal energy foams with slightly different compositions are also compared to the reference foam to test for possible effects of differences in composition (carbohydrate type, emulsifier) other than energy per se.

On each test day, volunteers will arrive at the clinic in a fasted state where they consume a standardized 250 kcal breakfast. Subjects receive one of the four test products 2.5 hours after start of breakfast and consume 400 ml of the test products with a spoon within 10 minutes. Each subject will be randomized to a treatment order according to a balanced (Williams type) design, and receive one of four test products each week for 4 weeks, separated by a one-week washout period (consumed on the same week day).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Satiety Appetite

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.