Comparative Study of Effects of Neuromuscular Warmup vs Conventional Warmup in Recreational Gym Population

NCT ID: NCT07340021

Last Updated: 2026-01-14

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 46 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2025-12-25
• Study Completion Date: 2026-06-15

Brief Summary

• Impaired balance or insufficient strength may increase the risk of musculoskeletal injuries among recreational enthusiasts. Warm-up protocols are an essential component of exercise preparation, aiming to enhance performance and reduce the risk of injury among physically active individuals.
• Neuromuscular warm-up protocols are designed to stimulate the sensorimotor system by integrating balance, coordination, strength, and proprioceptive exercises. These protocols enhance neuromuscular control, joint stability, and muscle activation, which are critical for dynamic movements performed during gym-based training and functional activities.
• Similarly, Conventional warm-up protocols consist of light aerobic activity and static or dynamic stretching. These protocols enhance blood flow and muscle flexibility.
• Dynamic balance refers to the ability to maintain postural control while performing movement tasks and is a key determinant of athletic performance and injury prevention.
• Strength is an essential component for functional performance and is commonly assessed through Counter jump movement tests.
• This study aims to compare the effects of a neuromuscular warm-up versus a conventional warm-up on dynamic balance and strength among recreational gym enthusiasts. The findings may help create a more effective warm-up strategy for improving performance in recreational enthusiasts.

Detailed Description

Experimental Group (Neuromuscular Warm-up Protocol):

Participants assigned to the experimental group underwent a structured neuromuscular warm-up (NM-W) program before their routine gym training sessions. The intervention was conducted four times per week over a period of six weeks, with each warm-up session lasting approximately 10-12 minutes at a low to moderate intensity. The protocol began with a light aerobic phase, consisting of treadmill jogging at 50-60% of maximum heart rate for two minutes, followed by dynamic mobility exercises such as arm circles and leg swings. This was followed by a core activation and strengthening phase, which included front planks, side planks, and single-leg glute bridges aimed at enhancing trunk stability and proximal muscle control. The final phase focused on balance and plyometric activities, including single-leg balance with eyes closed, step-ups, BOSU mini squats, and diagonal hopping drills combined with medicine-ball interception gestures. This neuromuscular warm-up protocol was specifically designed to improve neuromuscular integration, enhance dynamic balance, and increase muscular strength prior to resistance-based training.

Control Group ( conventional warmup Protocol):

Participants allocated to the control group received a conventional (traditional) warm-up protocol prior to their routine workout sessions. The warm-up was performed four times per week for six weeks same as in experimental group, with each session lasting approximately 12 minutes, matching the frequency and duration of the experimental group. The conventional warm-up consisted of a general aerobic component aimed at increasing body temperature and heart rate, followed by dynamic mobility exercises. The aerobic phase included treadmill jogging at 50-60% of maximum heart rate for approximately five minutes, after which participants performed dynamic movements such as leg swings, dynamic hip circles, arm swings, high knees, and butt kicks. The overall intensity of the warm-up was maintained at a low to moderate level (RPE 4-5). This protocol was intended to enhance blood circulation, improve muscle flexibility, and prepare the musculoskeletal system for subsequent exercise, without targeting specific neuromuscular, balance, or plyometric training components.

Conditions

Healthy Participants; Gym Population is Being Studied to Enhance Their Balance and Strength for Better Injury Prevention

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Neuromuscular Warm-up

Participants in the experimental group performed a neuromuscular warm-up program, prior to their training , designed to improve dynamic balance, strength via YBT and vertical jump along with overall neuromuscular control before their regular gym workouts. This warm-up focused on coordinated, functional movements that challenge postural stability and promote efficient muscle activation. The program included progressive balance tasks, controlled strength exercises, agility drills, and dynamic stability activities aimed at activating the neuromuscular system in a purposeful manner. slight progression was made every week All sessions were supervised to ensure correct technique, appropriate progression and the participant safety throughout the intervention period

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

NM Warm-up

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

The neuromuscular warm-up was performed four times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting approximately 10 to12 minutes at light to moderate intensity. The intervention consisted of single-leg balance exercises with reach tasks, bosu mini squats with controlled tempo, core stabilization exercises such as front and side planks, and agility-based movements including lateral shuffles and hops. Exercise difficulty was progressively increased by altering base of support, movement speed, and task complexity. The sequence was designed to improve motor control, balance reactions, and force production before the main workout. Dynamic balance and strength outcomes were assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention.

Conventional Warm-up

Participants in the control group performed a traditional warm-up routine that was different from the neuromuscular warm-up used in the experimental group. This approach mainly focused on getting the body ready for exercise by increasing heart rate and loosening the muscles, rather than improving neuromuscular control. Unlike the neuromuscular warm-up, this protocol did not include balance-challenging exercises, reactive movements, or tasks that required high levels of body awareness. The movements were simple and repetitive, with no added progression in difficulty, and were intended only to prepare participants physically before starting their regular gym workout.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Warm-up

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Participants in the control group completed the conventional warm-up four times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting about 10 to 12 minutes. The warm-up began with light aerobic activity, such as treadmill jogging or stationary cycling, to gently raise heart rate and body temperature. This was followed by dynamic mobility and stretching exercises, including leg swings, arm circles, hip rotations, , body-weight squats, and dynamic stretches for the hamstrings and calves also of upper body dynamic stretches . Overall, the conventional warm-up aimed to prepare the muscles and joints for exercise but did not specifically target neuromuscular activation, balance, or movement control.

Interventions

NM Warm-up

The neuromuscular warm-up was performed four times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting approximately 10 to12 minutes at light to moderate intensity. The intervention consisted of single-leg balance exercises with reach tasks, bosu mini squats with controlled tempo, core stabilization exercises such as front and side planks, and agility-based movements including lateral shuffles and hops. Exercise difficulty was progressively increased by altering base of support, movement speed, and task complexity. The sequence was designed to improve motor control, balance reactions, and force production before the main workout. Dynamic balance and strength outcomes were assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Conventional Warm-up

Participants in the control group completed the conventional warm-up four times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting about 10 to 12 minutes. The warm-up began with light aerobic activity, such as treadmill jogging or stationary cycling, to gently raise heart rate and body temperature. This was followed by dynamic mobility and stretching exercises, including leg swings, arm circles, hip rotations, , body-weight squats, and dynamic stretches for the hamstrings and calves also of upper body dynamic stretches . Overall, the conventional warm-up aimed to prepare the muscles and joints for exercise but did not specifically target neuromuscular activation, balance, or movement control.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Adults age ranging from 18 to 40 years
• No injury at the start of the study
• Willingness to attend all warmup sessions for 6 weeks
• Recreationally Active individuals who participates in exercise for ≥4 times per week
• Individuals who take part in Strength based training and perform closed kinematic chain exercises at least 2 times per week

Exclusion Criteria

• Any known cardiovascular, systemic illness that might hinder exercises
• History of any injury or surgery in the past 6 months
• Diagnosed neurological, musculoskeletal disorders
• Participation in any competitive professional sports or athletic training

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 40 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Prof. Dr. Shoaib Waqas

Prof. Dr. Shoaib Waqas

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Shoaib Waqas, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Muhammad Ibrahim, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lahore College of Physical Therapy

Muhammad Zoraiz Khan, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lahore College of Physical Therapy

Dua Ali Memon, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lahore College of Physical Therapy

Locations

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Countries

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Shoaib Waqas, Phd

Role: CONTACT

shoaib.waqas@ubas.edu.pk

+923024552109

Facility Contacts

Shoaib Waqas, Phd

Role: primary

shoaib.waqas@ubas.edu.pk

+923024552109

Other Identifiers

U1111-1333-1918

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DPT/ERB/42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id