The Impact of Blood Flow Restriction Within Warm-up.

NCT ID: NCT05153980

Last Updated: 2023-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-02

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sixty athletes will be randomized in two groups; (1) an experimental group and (2) a control group. Both groups will undergo the following procedure:

Moment 1:

1. Baseline testing: countermovement jump, 25m sprint and strength assessment of the Hamstrings and Quadriceps muscle.
2. Short warm-up (approximately 4 minutes), which will be completed with blood flow restriction cuffs (experimental group) or without (control group)
3. Post testing: same tests as performed in baseline.

Moment 2:

1. Baseline testing: stiffness measurements of the Biceps Femoris Long Head via Shear Wave Elastography.
2. Short warm-up (approximately 4 minutes), which will be completed with blood flow restriction cuffs (experimental group) or without (control group)
3. Post testing: same tests as performed in baseline.

Both moments of testing as well as the order in which the performance tests take place are randomized.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally, athletes perform a warm-up program before participating in sport activities, due to its assumed beneficial effect on performance and injury prevention. However, within team sports, substitutes usually do not perform the comprehensive pre-match warm-up. In many cases, those substitute players get a very short period of time, during the game, to prepare themselves for coming on to the pitch where they immediately have to perform at a very high-intensity. Hence, this could lead to a poorer performance and a greater injury risk for those substitute players, as they did not get a decent warm-up.

Therefore, new techniques are needed in order to prepare the substitute athletes optimally in a very short period of time (often within a few minutes). Consequently, the aim of this study is to investigate whether the incorporation of Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) within a warm-up routine could be of additional value. Both performance parameters and muscle stiffness will be evaluated. As Hamstring strain Injuries (HSI) are common within sports encompassing high-speed running, this muscle group will be investigated on muscle stiffness as a representation of the interventional effect on muscle stiffness. Athletes will be randomized in two groups of 30 participants (anticipated); (1) an experimental group and (2) a control group. Both groups will perform baseline testing (5x Countermovement Jump, 25m Sprint and Muscle Strength of hamstrings and Quadriceps), and a short warm-up program, followed by repeating the same tests as executed in baseline. The experimental group will receive Blood Flow Restriction within the warm-up routine, whereas the control group will do the same warm up program but without BFR.

On a separate occasion, the same athletes will perform the same warm-up routine with a Shear Wave Elastographic assessment of the Biceps Femoris Long Head before and after (immediately after, after 5 minutes and once more after 10 minutes) the warm-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Shear Wave Elastography Blood Flow Restriction Warm-up Performance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blood Flow Restriction

Incorporation of Blood Flow Restriction within the warm-up routine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Warm-up + Blood Flow Restriction cuff (smart-cuff pro device, acting as pressurized tourniquet)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Blood Flow Restriction

Control Group

Warm-up routine without any special intervention (no Blood Flow Restriction).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Warm-up

Intervention Type OTHER

Warm-up without any special intervention (no Blood Flow Restriction)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Warm-up + Blood Flow Restriction cuff (smart-cuff pro device, acting as pressurized tourniquet)

Blood Flow Restriction

Intervention Type DEVICE

Warm-up

Warm-up without any special intervention (no Blood Flow Restriction)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Kaatsu partial vascular occlusion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Free of pain at the moment of testing
* Adult (18+)
* Athletes (competitive team sport)

Exclusion Criteria

* History of a hamstring strain injury
* History of cardiovascular problems
* Recent (\<1 year) trauma or surgery of the lower extremity
* Reduced functioning or pain in the lower extremity.
* Not being able to perform physical activities, for whatever (medical) reason.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erik Witvrouw

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Departement of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B6702021000931

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id