The Effect of Dairy and Dairy-Free Alternative Beverages on Post-Exercise Anabolism in Active Youth

NCT ID: NCT05827666

Last Updated: 2023-04-25

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 24 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2023-02-01
• Study Completion Date: 2023-12-31

Brief Summary

The growth and development of lean body mass (i.e., muscle and bone) is instrumental to health and performance across the lifespan, especially in youth, as they actively experience growth. Thus, it is important to capitalize on physical activity and nutrition (especially dietary protein), to support the accretion of lean tissues. Eating a protein-rich meal or performing physical activity can stimulate protein synthesis, and when repeated over time, lean body mass accretion. There is currently an increasing market demand for non-dairy alternatives, due to multiple reasons including environmental, ethical, or taste preferences. However, it is important to understand how different beverages may support 'growth' (anabolism) of lean tissues after exercise. Research in adults has shown that dairy milk is superior to non-dairy milk beverages for supporting post-exercise recovery and muscle protein synthesis. However, the impact of dairy and non-dairy milk alternatives on recovery from exercise is not well understood in children. By understanding the milk beverage that best supports post-exercise recovery, the investigators can determine the optimal nutritional environment to facilitate the growth of lean tissues in the body.

Detailed Description

The growth and development of lean body mass (LBM) (e.g., muscle and bone) is vital to not only support health and performance across the lifespan but also, reduce the prevalence of metabolic disorders later in life, such as osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Active youth who regularly perform moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) have superior increases LBM and muscle strength compared to their sedentary counterparts. LBM is regulated by the process of protein breakdown (PB), where old or damaged proteins are broken down releasing their constituent amino acids (AA), as well as protein synthesis (PS), a process by which new proteins are made by linking constituent AAs together. When rates of PS exceed rates of PB (PS>PB), a positive net protein balance is achieved, ultimately facilitating the accretion of LBM. Contrarily, if PB>PS, net protein balance is negative, leading to the loss of LBM.

Assuming total energy intakes are met, to meet the metabolic demands of an active lifestyle, dietary protein is a prime anabolic stimulus. This macronutrient facilitates the growth of lean tissues by providing the AA 'building blocks' to support the synthesis of muscle and other body proteins. Physical activity (PA) is a second pre-eminent factor contributing to the growth of LBM. Following exercise, in the absence of dietary protein ingestion, net protein balance is negative. However, post-exercise protein consumption facilitates a positive net protein balance, which when repeated over time, can contribute to the accretion of LBM. Youth who engage in high levels of PA have greater LBM compared to their sedentary counterparts. Thus, it is important to capitalize on the optimal nutritional and exercise interventions to support a positive net protein balance, an acute marker of growth, especially in vulnerable populations, such as children.

In children, milk protein ingestion has been shown to stimulate whole-body PS, resulting in a positive whole-body net protein balance. In adults, dairy proteins lead to superior post-exercise recovery and PS compared to non-dairy alternatives. Most research to date examining the post-prandial protein synthesis responses to plant-based protein sources have encompassed isolated protein sources. However, there is currently a paucity of research examining the effect of the whole-food matrix of plant-based protein sources on whole-body protein metabolism in active youth. Furthermore, the pubertal growth spurt is characterized by rapid accumulation of LBM that is only surpassed by the first year of life. This LBM, which is enhanced by an active lifestyle, must be supported by adequate energy and protein ingestion. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the post-exercise anabolic effect of dairy and non-dairy whole foods on markers of LBM growth and whole-body protein metabolism, especially in children, an under-researched population.

The current project will employ the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) methodology to determine the protein/AA intake that minimizes oxidation of the indicator AA, while maximizing PS. The oxidation of the indicator AA is minimized by ingesting an adequate proportion of AA, and/or consuming nutritionally complete protein sources. The main objective of the present study is to determine the effect of energy-matched dairy and non-dairy milk alternatives on whole-body protein synthesis in active youth following exercise.

Aim 1: To determine the effect of dairy (2% milk) and non-dairy milk alternatives (soy, rice, and almond 'milk' beverages) on whole-body PS following a bout of intermittent exercise in children, adolescent males, and adolescent females.

Hypothesis 1: Whole body PS will be greatest after ingestion of dairy milk compared to isocaloric (i.e., equal energy amount) non-dairy alternatives, due to the greater and/or higher amount of quality dietary protein. Regardless of sex, adolescents are expected to have greater PS due to their heightened anabolic sensitivity, compared to children.

Conditions

Dietary Proteins; Indicator Amino Acid Oxidation

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Primary Study Purpose: OTHER
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Children

Participants will undergo four metabolic trials in a randomized crossover design, where they will be provided with an isoenergetic (i.e., equal calories) amount of one of the following beverages upon completing a standardized bout of variably intensity exercise: 2% milk, almond 'milk,' soy 'milk,' or rice 'milk.'

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2% milk beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Protein provided at 0.3 g/kg fat-free mass. All other conditions (almond, soy and rice milk alternative beverages) will be matched to the same energy content (i.e., isoenergetic). Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 52 kcal; Fat: 2.25 g; Carbohydrates: 4.8 g; Protein: 3.3 g.

Almond milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 24 kcal; Fat: 1.13 g; Carbohydrates: 3.1 g; Protein: 0.3 g.

Soy milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 39 kcal; Fat: 1.70 g; Carbohydrates: 3.0 g; Protein: 2.9 g.

Rice milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 49 kcal; Fat: 1.09 g; Carbohydrates: 9.8 g; Protein: 0.1 g.

Adolescent females

Participants will undergo four metabolic trials in a randomized crossover design, where they will be provided with an isoenergetic (i.e., equal calories) amount of one of the following beverages upon completing a standardized bout of variably intensity exercise: 2% milk, almond 'milk,' soy 'milk,' or rice 'milk.'

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2% milk beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Protein provided at 0.3 g/kg fat-free mass. All other conditions (almond, soy and rice milk alternative beverages) will be matched to the same energy content (i.e., isoenergetic). Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 52 kcal; Fat: 2.25 g; Carbohydrates: 4.8 g; Protein: 3.3 g.

Almond milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 24 kcal; Fat: 1.13 g; Carbohydrates: 3.1 g; Protein: 0.3 g.

Soy milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 39 kcal; Fat: 1.70 g; Carbohydrates: 3.0 g; Protein: 2.9 g.

Rice milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 49 kcal; Fat: 1.09 g; Carbohydrates: 9.8 g; Protein: 0.1 g.

Adolescent males

Participants will undergo four metabolic trials in a randomized crossover design, where they will be provided with an isoenergetic (i.e., equal calories) amount of one of the following beverages upon completing a standardized bout of variably intensity exercise: 2% milk, almond 'milk,' soy 'milk,' or rice 'milk.'

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2% milk beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Protein provided at 0.3 g/kg fat-free mass. All other conditions (almond, soy and rice milk alternative beverages) will be matched to the same energy content (i.e., isoenergetic). Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 52 kcal; Fat: 2.25 g; Carbohydrates: 4.8 g; Protein: 3.3 g.

Almond milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 24 kcal; Fat: 1.13 g; Carbohydrates: 3.1 g; Protein: 0.3 g.

Soy milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 39 kcal; Fat: 1.70 g; Carbohydrates: 3.0 g; Protein: 2.9 g.

Rice milk alternative beverage

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 49 kcal; Fat: 1.09 g; Carbohydrates: 9.8 g; Protein: 0.1 g.

Interventions

2% milk beverage

Protein provided at 0.3 g/kg fat-free mass. All other conditions (almond, soy and rice milk alternative beverages) will be matched to the same energy content (i.e., isoenergetic). Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 52 kcal; Fat: 2.25 g; Carbohydrates: 4.8 g; Protein: 3.3 g.

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Almond milk alternative beverage

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 24 kcal; Fat: 1.13 g; Carbohydrates: 3.1 g; Protein: 0.3 g.

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Soy milk alternative beverage

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 39 kcal; Fat: 1.70 g; Carbohydrates: 3.0 g; Protein: 2.9 g.

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Rice milk alternative beverage

Matched to the same energy intake as 0.3 g/kg FFM of 2% milk. Macronutrient content of beverage (per 100 g): Calories: 49 kcal; Fat: 1.09 g; Carbohydrates: 9.8 g; Protein: 0.1 g.

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Natrel 2% milk; Silk Original Almond Beverage; Silk Original Soy Beverage; Rice Dream Milk Beverage

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Between the ages of 8-16 years
• Children: >-1 y age from peak height velocity* (aPHV)
• Adolescents: -0.5 to 1.5 aPHV
• An age and sex-specific minimum of 75th percentile Beep Test level
• Considered healthy based on responses to the PAR-Q+ and a medical history form *NOTE: age from peak height velocity (aPHV): sitting/standing height

Exclusion Criteria

• Almond or soy allergy
• Lactose intolerance
• If enrolled as a child participant: biological age outside of >-1 years from aPHV
• If enrolled as an adolescent participant: biological age outside -0.5 to 1.5 aPHV
• Inability to perform physical activity as determined by the PAR-Q+ and iPAQ
• Inability to adhere to protocol guidelines (e.g., 2-day controlled diet)
• Diagnosed medical condition under the care of a physician (e.g., type 1 diabetes)
• Consuming any medications known to affect protein metabolism (e.g., corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories)
• Failure to complete all four metabolic trials within four months

• Minimum Eligible Age: 8 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 16 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Dairy Management Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Daniel Moore

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Nicki Pourhashemi, BSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Toronto

Locations

Goldring Centre for High Performance and Sport

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Canada

Central Contacts

Daniel R Moore, PhD

Role: CONTACT

dr.moore@utoronto.ca

4169464088

Hugo JW Fung, PhD (c)

Role: CONTACT

hugojernwai.fung@utoronto.ca

Facility Contacts

Daniel Moore, PhD

Role: primary

dr.moore@utoronto.ca

4169464088

Nicki Pourhashemi, BSc

Role: backup

nicki.pourhashemi@mail.utoronto.ca

6478817899

Other Identifiers

43728

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id