Impact of the Save the Shame! Game on Advanced Life Support Knowledge

NCT ID: NCT05692375

Last Updated: 2023-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gamification, listed by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) as a learning process in its 2021 guidelines, is a new digital innovation tool that brings added value towards motivation that seems to reuse time in a creative way. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the game "Save the shame!" on advanced life support (ALS) knowledge of nurses and physicians in intensive care medicine settings. This is a cross-sectional study following a mixed methodology. In its preliminary phase it follows a qualitative and exploratory methodology, with application of the E-Delphi technique for creation and validation of the "Save the shame! game and validation of the ALS knowledge test. The study subsequently follows the experimental methodology. The investigators expect to confirm the hypothesis that the game "Save the Shame!" has a positive impact on the skills training of health professionals in intensive care medicine settings in a Portuguese hospital center.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Design The investigators developed an experimental approach, where randomization in sample identification was ensured and where a control group was present, favoring a strongest level of contribution to the evidence. This is a cross-sectional study with quantitative data collection following a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design.

In order to carry out the proposed experimental study, it was necessary to create two essential elements in this process: the "Save the Same!" game and the ALS knowledge assessment test, which constitutes a data collection instrument necessary to test the research hypotheses.

Arms, Groups, and Interventions The population was defined as nurses and physicians of the intensive care units of a Portuguese hospital center (N=275). The inclusion criteria were, to be a nurse or a physician, to provide care in a intensive care unit of the identified hospital center (cirurgical, cardiothoracic, coronary, medical or trauma). On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were, be any other health professional, providing care in settings other than intensive care settings, absence of informed consent, belonging to the invited group of experts, participation in the instrument design pre-test.

Participants were invited via institutional email and data was collected through the access of on-line platforms.

The experimental group was asked to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform. The control group neither used nor had access to the game. Afterwards both groups performed the ALS knowledge assessment test. It is a test with 20 multiple choice questions each scored as right (0.5 points) or wrong (0 points).

The sample was stratified in order to eliminate "professional group" variable. This was a protocol update at made at 10th of March

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The investigators developed an experimental approach, where we ensured randomization in sample identification and where a control group was present, favoring a strongest level of contribution to the evidence. This is a cross-sectional study with quantitative data collection following a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

The experimental group will be inveted to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Invitation to play the game "Save the shame!"

Intervention Type OTHER

The experimental group was asked to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform . The control group neither used nor had access to the game. Afterwards both groups performed the ALS knowledge assessment test. It is a test with 20 multiple choice questions each scored as right (0.5 points) or wrong (0 points).

Control

The control group neither used nor had access to the game.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Invitation to play the game "Save the shame!"

The experimental group was asked to use the game. Two weeks were defined as the time to use the game. The use of the game can be seen by the coded digital record on its digital platform . The control group neither used nor had access to the game. Afterwards both groups performed the ALS knowledge assessment test. It is a test with 20 multiple choice questions each scored as right (0.5 points) or wrong (0 points).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* to be a nurse or a physician,
* to provide care in a intensive care unit of the identified hospital center (cirurgical, cardiothoracic, coronary, medical or trauma)

Exclusion Criteria

* be any other health professional
* providing care in settings other than intensive care settings
* absence of informed consent
* belonging to the invited group of experts
* participation in the instrument design pre-test
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Minho

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sara Santos Ribeiro

Principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chvng

Vila Nova de Gaia, , Portugal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.