The Impact of a Whole-food Animal-based Versus Plant-based Protein Rich Meal on Muscle Protein Synthesis

NCT ID: NCT05151887

Last Updated: 2023-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-28

Study Completion Date

2022-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Food intake stimulates muscle protein synthesis rates. The magnitude of the anabolic response to feeding forms a key factor in regulating muscle mass maintenance. Ingestion of animal-derived proteins generally leads to a greater stimulation of muscle protein synthesis when compared to the ingestion of plant-derived proteins. What is often neglected is that the anabolic properties of protein isolates do not necessarily reflect the anabolic response to the ingestion of the whole-foods from which those are derived. This discrepancy is due to the presence or absence of other components normally found within whole-food matrices, which influence protein digestion and amino acid absorption from animal based and plant based protein sources. A rapid and robust post-prandial release of food-derived amino acids is of particular relevance for older individuals, who typically show a blunted muscle protein synthetic response to feeding

Objective: To compare the post-prandial muscle protein synthetic response following ingestion of a whole-food meal (560 kilo calorie (kCal); \~36 g protein total, \~0.45 g/kg body weight) containing \~100 g lean ground beef (\~30 g protein) versus the ingestion of an isonitrogenous, isocaloric whole-food meal containing only plant-based protein sources (561 kCal; \~36 g protein total) in vivo in healthy, older men and women.

Study design: randomized, counter-balanced, cross-over design, researchers and participants are not blinded, analysts are blinded.

Study population: 16 healthy older (65-85 y) men and women (1:1 ratio of men:women)

Intervention: Participants will undergo 2 test days. On one test day participants will consume a whole-food meal containing meat as the primary source of protein (\~36 g, \~0.45 g/kg body weight). On the other day, participants will consume a whole-food meal containing only plant-based foods as the source of protein (\~36 g or \~0.45 g/kg body weight). In addition, a continuous intravenous tracer infusion will be applied, and blood an muscle samples will be collected in order to assess the muscle protein synthetic response.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint will be mixed muscle protein synthesis rates over the full 6h post-prandial period following meal ingestion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Food intake stimulates muscle protein synthesis rates. The anabolic response to feeding forms a key factor in regulating muscle mass maintenance. Impairments in the sensitivity of skeletal muscle tissue to respond to the anabolic properties of protein feeding have been reported in numerous settings where muscle mass is being lost, such as aging, disuse, chronic metabolic disease, and various clinical conditions where muscle wasting is apparent.

The capacity of a dietary protein to stimulate post-prandial muscle protein accretion depends on the digestion and absorption kinetics of that protein as well as its amino acid composition. A more rapid rise in circulating essential amino acids (EAAs), with leucine in particular, drives the post-prandial rise in muscle protein synthesis rates. It has been suggested that plant and animal based protein sources do not have the same anabolic properties due to differences digestibility and essential amino acid composition. However, so far, nearly all studies evaluating the muscle protein synthetic response to food ingestion have applied a reductionist approach and have determined the muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of isolated protein sources (e.g., whey, casein, soy) with or without other isolated meal components (e.g., carbohydrates, fats). This work suggests that the ingestion of isolated animal-based proteins stimulates a superior muscle protein synthetic response when compared to the ingestion of isolated plant-based proteins. However, protein isolates never constitute the main protein portion of a meal. Perhaps more importantly, it is often neglected that the anabolic properties of protein isolates do not necessarily reflect the anabolic response to the ingestion of the whole-foods from which those are derived. This discrepancy is due to the presence or absence of other nutritional components within whole-food matrices. In particular, plant-derived protein sources contain anti-nutritional factors that impair protein digestion and amino acid absorption and, as such, compromise the post-prandial rise in muscle protein synthesis rates.

Therefore, this project will compare the impact of the ingestion of a whole-food meal with beef as the primary source of protein, with the ingestion of a whole food meal ingestion with only plant derived protein sources, on the muscle protein synthetic response in healthy older men and women.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Protein Synthesis Sarcopenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

The present study utilizes a randomized, counter-balanced, cross-over design in healthy older male and female participants. In total, 16 healthy older men and women (1:1 ratio of men:women) will participate in the study (20 including potential drop-out). Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive the meal including meat or exclusively plant based foods during the Test Day 1. During Test Day 2, participants will receive the other meal.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

In this trial, neither the participants, nor the researchers who perform the trial days will be blinded to the intervention allocation. However, the researchers performing the sample analysis are blinded to intervention allocation and are not involved in the research study during the trial days.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Meat meal

Minced beef, potato, string beans, apple sauce, and herb butter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle protein synthesis

Intervention Type OTHER

The meals contain a total of 0.45 g protein/kg body mass (36 g protein for an 80 kg person). To account for differences in body mass, the investigators will scale the meal content to ensure 0.45 g/kg body mass for different body mass ranges (i.e., 65-75 kg, 75-85 kg, etc.). As such, carbohydrate, fat, and total energy content of the meals will also be scaled to body mass. The test meals are composed out of regular whole food items which will be purchased from local shops. The muscle protein synthetic response following meal ingestion will be assessed by the use of stable isotope tracer methodology

Plant meal

Quinoa, soy beans, chickpeas, broad beans, and soy sauce

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle protein synthesis

Intervention Type OTHER

The meals contain a total of 0.45 g protein/kg body mass (36 g protein for an 80 kg person). To account for differences in body mass, the investigators will scale the meal content to ensure 0.45 g/kg body mass for different body mass ranges (i.e., 65-75 kg, 75-85 kg, etc.). As such, carbohydrate, fat, and total energy content of the meals will also be scaled to body mass. The test meals are composed out of regular whole food items which will be purchased from local shops. The muscle protein synthetic response following meal ingestion will be assessed by the use of stable isotope tracer methodology

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Muscle protein synthesis

The meals contain a total of 0.45 g protein/kg body mass (36 g protein for an 80 kg person). To account for differences in body mass, the investigators will scale the meal content to ensure 0.45 g/kg body mass for different body mass ranges (i.e., 65-75 kg, 75-85 kg, etc.). As such, carbohydrate, fat, and total energy content of the meals will also be scaled to body mass. The test meals are composed out of regular whole food items which will be purchased from local shops. The muscle protein synthetic response following meal ingestion will be assessed by the use of stable isotope tracer methodology

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 65-85 years
* Body mass index 18.5 - 30 kg/m2
* Healthy
* Having given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy for one of the food items used
* \>5% weight change in the previous 6 months
* Participating in a structured (progressive) exercise program
* Smoking
* Diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders
* Diagnosed metabolic disorders (e.g. diabetes)
* Use of any medications known to affect protein metabolism (i.e. corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories).
* Chronic use of gastric acid suppressing medication
* Chronic use of anti-coagulants
* Diagnosed GI tract disorders or diseases
* Blood donation in the past 2 months
* Strict vegetarian diet
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cattlemen's Beef Association

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vion Food Group

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luc van Loon, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Center+

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pinckaers PJ, Domic J, Petrick HL, Holwerda AM, Trommelen J, Hendriks FK, Houben LH, Goessens JP, van Kranenburg JM, Senden JM, de Groot LC, Verdijk LB, Snijders T, van Loon LJ. Higher Muscle Protein Synthesis Rates Following Ingestion of an Omnivorous Meal Compared with an Isocaloric and Isonitrogenous Vegan Meal in Healthy, Older Adults. J Nutr. 2024 Jul;154(7):2120-2132. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37972895 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

METC 21-006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Protein Complementation of Plant-based Diets.
NCT07151625 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA