Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction

NCT ID: NCT04968327

Last Updated: 2021-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2017-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the study aimed to clinically evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement, as evaluated by its effect on the rate of canine retraction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ten adult patients requiring maxillary first premolars' extraction were enrolled in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Micro-osteoperforations were randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch at the canine-premolar region, and the contralateral side served as the control.

Mini-screws were used for anchorage reinforcement, and canine retraction was performed using nickel-titanium closed coil springs, delivering a force of 150 grams per side.

The primary outcome was the measurement of canine retraction rate throughout the study period from digital dental models obtained every 3 weeks.

The secondary outcome was the detection of possible canine tipping during retraction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

split-mouth
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Micro-osteoperforations

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

Intervention Type OTHER

MOPs included shallow perforations of the buccal cortical plate surrounding the tooth that requires orthodontic tooth movement, with no flap reflection was performed using a surgical bur using the special calibrated device called PROPEL

Conventional canine retraction

Intervention Type OTHER

using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

Canine retraction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional canine retraction

Intervention Type OTHER

using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

MOPs included shallow perforations of the buccal cortical plate surrounding the tooth that requires orthodontic tooth movement, with no flap reflection was performed using a surgical bur using the special calibrated device called PROPEL

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional canine retraction

using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy systemic condition with no chronic diseases
* no previous orthodontic treatment
* adequate oral hygiene
* have a healthy periodontium
* signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* have a chronic disease
* previous orthodontic treatment
* poor oral hygiene or periodontal conidition
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Assistant lecturer of DPH and Clinical statistician

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Canine retraction2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.