Micro-Osteoperforations to Accelerate Maxillary Canine Retraction in Class I Malocclusion

NCT ID: NCT07155018

Last Updated: 2025-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This single-blinded, split-mouth randomized controlled trial investigates whether micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) can accelerate maxillary canine retraction in orthodontic patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction. The study also evaluates postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale at 1, 3, and 7 days.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MOPs are a flapless, minimally invasive surgical technique that stimulates bone remodeling and may reduce orthodontic treatment time. In this trial, one side of each patient receives MOPs while the contralateral side serves as control. Canine retraction is performed using miniscrews, power arms, and NiTi coil springs. Outcomes include the rate of canine movement over 16 weeks and pain assessment using VAS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion, Angle Class I

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is a single-blinded, split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Each participant received both interventions: on one side of the maxillary arch, micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) were performed distal to the canine, while the contralateral side served as the control with conventional retraction. Outcomes were measured within the same patient, reducing inter-individual variability.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Only the outcome assessor was blinded to the intervention allocation. Patients and treating clinicians were aware of the intervention side, but the examiner performing digital measurements and statistical analysis did not know which side received MOPs.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations

On the experimental side, micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) were performed distal to the maxillary canine under local anesthesia using the Excellerator RT device. Three perforations, each 1.5 mm in diameter and 5 mm deep, were created in the attached gingiva. Canine retraction was then carried out using miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations.

Control: Conventional Retraction

On the control side, maxillary canine retraction was performed using miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs without any micro-osteoperforations. The mechanics were identical to the experimental side to ensure comparability.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Canine Retraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Canine Retraction

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 16-25 years
* Patients requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars as part of orthodontic treatment
* Angle Class I molar relationship
* No previous orthodontic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* History of craniofacial trauma or congenital anomalies
* Systemic or bone-related diseases
* Current smoking
* Use of medications affecting bone metabolism
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lam Nguyen Le, Ph.D.DDS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Pediatrics Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Odonto- Stomatology, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Can Tho University Hospital

Can Tho, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-164-

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DuongThaoTrangCtump

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.