Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Self-ligating Brackets System Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations

NCT ID: NCT05595174

Last Updated: 2024-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-15

Study Completion Date

2024-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Assessment of maxillary canine retraction using self-ligating brackets system assisted with micro-osteoperforations: A prospective controlled clinical study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Accerleration of Tooth Movement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1

Patient with self-ligating bracket system split mouth with and without micro-osteoperforations.

Extraction of first premolars were done. A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

self ligating bracket with micro osteoperforation

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment. Micro-osteoperforations will be formed

self ligating bracket without micro osteoperforation

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.

group 2

Patient with conventional bracket with split mouth with and without micro-osteoperforations.

Extraction of first premolars were done. A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional bracket with micro osteoperforation

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment. Micro-osteoperforations will be formed.

conventional bracket without micro osteoperforation

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

self ligating bracket with micro osteoperforation

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment. Micro-osteoperforations will be formed

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

conventional bracket with micro osteoperforation

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment. Micro-osteoperforations will be formed.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

conventional bracket without micro osteoperforation

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

self ligating bracket without micro osteoperforation

A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Both male and female patients between the age (14-20 y).
* Patients indicated for maxillary first premolar extraction.
* Angle's Class I bimaxillary, Class II Division 1 malocclusion (ANB \<5).
* Irregularity index \< 4 mm.
* No previous orthodontic treatment.
* Fully erupted dentition.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not indicated for non-extraction approach.
* Prominent canine root (in labial cortical bone).
* History of systemic and medical illness that could interfere with OTM.
* Previous orthodontic treatment.
* Extreme skeletal class II occlusion (ANB \>5).
* Poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised patient
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Khaled Sobhy Abdelaziz

doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

khaled sobhy abdelaziz, master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Al-Azhar University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alazhar University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abbing A, Koretsi V, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN. Duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescents and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2020 Oct 5;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00334-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33015719 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

850/2057

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.