Effect of Micro-osteoperforation on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT ID: NCT03450278
Last Updated: 2018-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2018-01-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT04968327
Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine Retraction
NCT04868721
Micro-Osteoperforations to Accelerate Maxillary Canine Retraction in Class I Malocclusion
NCT07155018
The Effectiveness of Double-slot Brackets Versus Single-slot Brackets on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT06481761
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance, leveling and alignment proceeded till 0.016" × 0.022" NiTi upper archwire. Indirect skeletal anchorage was then prepared using TADs inserted bilaterally between the upper 1st molar and 2nd premolar, and the patient was referred for upper 1st premolars extraction.
Three months after extraction, 0.017" × 0.025" stainless-steel upper archwire was inserted and three vertically aligned MOPs were randomly allocated and performed in one side using a single TAD, while the other side served as control. The three MOPs were performed distal to the canine, equidistant in the extraction space. Bilateral canine retraction was then commenced using NiTi closing coil springs delivering 150 gms of force. Before leaving the clinic, a pain questionnaire was given to each patient.
Data were collected from monthly upper impressions, which were poured into stone models and scanned to obtain sequential digital models (T0, T1, T2, T3 \& T4), in addition to pre- and post-retraction maxillary CBCT images.
The assessed outcomes were the rate of canine retraction per month, the total distance travelled by the upper canines, first molars anchorage loss, tipping, torque and rotation of upper canines and first molars, canine root resorption and finally the pain related to MOP procedure. Statistical analysis was performed on the gathered data and results were withdrawn.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control
canine retraction without any means of acceleration.
No interventions assigned to this group
micro-osteoperforation
canine retraction accelerated with micro-osteoperforation
micro-osteoperforation
Minor surgical procedure including performance of limited and shallow perforations of the cortical plate of bone to increase the expression of inflammatory cytokines, hence accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
micro-osteoperforation
Minor surgical procedure including performance of limited and shallow perforations of the cortical plate of bone to increase the expression of inflammatory cytokines, hence accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Full permanent dentition with exception of the third molars.
* Good oral hygiene and periodontal condition.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients suffering from any congenital, hereditary or systemic diseases.
* Chronic use of any medications affecting orthodontic tooth movement (e.g. corticosteroids, hormonal therapy, NSAIDs)
* Patients with dental anomalies (e.g. enamel hypoplasia, root dilacerations in maxillary canines).
* Patients with medical conditions that contraindicate surgeries (e.g. bleeding tendency and immunocompromised patients).
* Radiographic evidence of bone loss.
16 Years
30 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amira Aboalnaga
Assistant Lecturer, Dr. Amira Ahmed Mohamed Anis Aboalnaga
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2015-07-10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.