Effect of Micro-osteoperforation on the Rate of Canine Retraction

NCT ID: NCT03450278

Last Updated: 2018-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current study Is a split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial that was performed to investigate three dimensionally, using digital models and Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging, the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of tooth movement in a canine retraction model.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sample size calculation was carried out and resulted in enrolment of 18 female patients requiring bilateral upper first premolars extraction and canine retraction with maximum anchorage. The sample was recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.

After placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance, leveling and alignment proceeded till 0.016" × 0.022" NiTi upper archwire. Indirect skeletal anchorage was then prepared using TADs inserted bilaterally between the upper 1st molar and 2nd premolar, and the patient was referred for upper 1st premolars extraction.

Three months after extraction, 0.017" × 0.025" stainless-steel upper archwire was inserted and three vertically aligned MOPs were randomly allocated and performed in one side using a single TAD, while the other side served as control. The three MOPs were performed distal to the canine, equidistant in the extraction space. Bilateral canine retraction was then commenced using NiTi closing coil springs delivering 150 gms of force. Before leaving the clinic, a pain questionnaire was given to each patient.

Data were collected from monthly upper impressions, which were poured into stone models and scanned to obtain sequential digital models (T0, T1, T2, T3 \& T4), in addition to pre- and post-retraction maxillary CBCT images.

The assessed outcomes were the rate of canine retraction per month, the total distance travelled by the upper canines, first molars anchorage loss, tipping, torque and rotation of upper canines and first molars, canine root resorption and finally the pain related to MOP procedure. Statistical analysis was performed on the gathered data and results were withdrawn.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orthodontics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control

canine retraction without any means of acceleration.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

micro-osteoperforation

canine retraction accelerated with micro-osteoperforation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

micro-osteoperforation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Minor surgical procedure including performance of limited and shallow perforations of the cortical plate of bone to increase the expression of inflammatory cytokines, hence accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

micro-osteoperforation

Minor surgical procedure including performance of limited and shallow perforations of the cortical plate of bone to increase the expression of inflammatory cytokines, hence accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

alveolocentesis bone puncturing flapless corticotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Malocclusion that requires bilateral extraction of the maxillary first premolars and canine retraction with maximum anchorage; Class II division 1 and bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion cases.
* Full permanent dentition with exception of the third molars.
* Good oral hygiene and periodontal condition.

Exclusion Criteria

* Medically compromised patients.
* Patients suffering from any congenital, hereditary or systemic diseases.
* Chronic use of any medications affecting orthodontic tooth movement (e.g. corticosteroids, hormonal therapy, NSAIDs)
* Patients with dental anomalies (e.g. enamel hypoplasia, root dilacerations in maxillary canines).
* Patients with medical conditions that contraindicate surgeries (e.g. bleeding tendency and immunocompromised patients).
* Radiographic evidence of bone loss.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amira Aboalnaga

Assistant Lecturer, Dr. Amira Ahmed Mohamed Anis Aboalnaga

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2015-07-10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.