Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines

NCT ID: NCT03535285

Last Updated: 2018-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-15

Study Completion Date

2017-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgical modification technique try to get bodily movement during upper canine retraction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

I- Original surgical technique (Liou and Huang technique, 1998) :

On the conventional surgical side, (the control side), the intersepital bone was undermined by two vertical cuts on the mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal line angles of the first premolar socket. They were connected at the base of the socket by an oblique cut. The surgical round bur was held parallel to the long axis of the canine and moved buccolingually, while shaving the interseptal bone buccolingual (back-and-forth) shaving movements were reduced the thickness of the interseptal bone by approximately 1 mm

II- Modified surgical technique:

In the surgical modification side, (the experimental side), intra-alveolar mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal cuts and interseptal bone shaving were done by surgical round bur and copious irrigation, without the oblique cut since it was done blindly in the original surgical technique. A buccal semilunar flap was opened on the apical area of canine-premolar region. The surgical pin helped also in location of the point of initial drilling of the apical horizontal cut from buccal approach, when the surgical pin's socket arm rested on the depth of the socket, the vestibular arm marked the point of access. It also estimated mesiodeistal extension of the apical horizontal cut. The apical horizontal cut was started from the socket apex to half way of the interseptal bone mesiodistally as an extension and for the depth, Mallet and Chisel were used from the cortical bone to reach the mesio-palatal cut. The flap was sutured. This surgical modification step provided more predictability and safer surgery than the blind oblique cut in the original surgical technique.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Split-mouth
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical modification side

Periodontal ligament distraction without the oblique cuts but with apical horizontal cut

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Periodontal ligament distraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

decrease the bony resistant during canine retration

Conventional surgery

Periodontal ligament distraction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Periodontal ligament distraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

decrease the bony resistant during canine retration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Periodontal ligament distraction

decrease the bony resistant during canine retration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Acceleration of canine retraction

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Orthodontic patients needed extraction of upper first premolars, with age range from 18 - 25 years old.
2. All patients were medically free. (See Appendix II)
3. No previous orthodontic treatment.
4. Adequate oral hygiene and periodontally healthy teeth.
5. The canines were almost leveled and aligned.
6. Maximum anchorage requirements.
7. Healthy canines; no deep carious lesions, no endodontic lesions, no root canal treatment, nor internal or external root resorption.
8. All patients were informed of the procedure and signed the consents.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects were excluded from the study when:

1. They failed to keep several consecutive appointments.
2. Oral hygiene was subjectively judged as deteriorating during the preliminary stages of patient preparation.
3. Compliance with the instructions provided was inadequate.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Monaser Mobarak

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monaser M Elashik, Master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University - Orthodontic department

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liou EJ, Huang CS. Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Oct;114(4):372-82. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70181-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9790320 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.